Laserfiche WebLink
Councihnember Hendriksen suggested giving the applicant the option of meeting City Code or <br />agree to waive relocation expenses if the City were to redevelop the site. <br /> <br />Ms. Cook replied that she can purchase brick at a reasonable rate since that is the business they <br />are in and would have no problem with complying with City Code. She explained that they <br />proposed the vinyl siding because all of the surrounding businesses are done in vinyl siding and <br />would have a better appearance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that this site is not in the corridor of the river crossing and <br />they should not be required to do anything other than what their neighbors were required to do. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmeirnan, seconded by Councilmember Connolly, to grant site <br />plan approval to Chalich Trucking contingent upon compliance with City Staff Review Letter <br />dated June 30, 2000, with the exterior walls being finished as proposed, and applying brick <br />facade to the truck terminal as previously approved. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Connolly, <br />Anderson, and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #3: Request for Site Plan Review; Boilermakers #647 <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald stated that the City of Ramsey has received a request <br />for site plan review from Boilermakers #647. The plan proposes to construct a training center <br />addition onto an existing building. The site is located at 9459 Highway 10 NW. Boilermakers <br />are proposing a 2,016 square foot addition onto an existing building in the B-1 Business District. <br />The proposed addition and existing building complies with the 35% building coverage <br />restriction. Due to some replatting in 1997, staff's interpretation of the side and rear yards has <br />changed. The result of this is that the applicant should obtain a variance to the rear yard setback. <br />The exterior of the finish on the building is proposed to consist of a combination of brick, <br />painted concrete block, rockface concrete block, and cedar siding with asphalt shingles. The use <br />of the cedar siding in the proposed addition would be consistent with the existing building, but it <br />does deviate from City Code and requires Council approval. Staff was originally recommending <br />use of integrally color treated concrete block versus painted block but they have determined that <br />the painted block is acceptable. Thirty parking spaces are provided, which is slightly deficient of <br />the thirty-four spaces required by City Code, but adequate for the use of the building. All <br />proposed parking and drive areas will be paved. No curb and gutter are proposed. City Code <br />requires B-612 concrete curb to be installed around the perimeter of the newly paved area. Staff <br />recommended that the remainder of the current paved area also have B-612 curbing installed to <br />comply with City Code. The new addition will create approximately 3,600 square feet of <br />additional paving between the building addition and new driveway. The drainage from the new <br />building will be largely absorbed in turfed and wooded areas. The driveway will drain <br />northwardly to be the wooded area and southeasterly to the existing parking lot. It was also <br /> <br />City Council/August 8, 2000 <br /> Page 7 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />