Laserfiche WebLink
sewer pipe in the area. Councilmember Hendriksen disclosed that he had purchased a garage <br />door from the applicant and inquired if he should abstain from voting. City Attorney Goodrich <br />replied no. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Anderson, Connolly, Hendriksen, <br />and Zim~nerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #5: Request for Site Plan Review ofM & G Leasing; Case of Milton Glass <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that the City of Ramsey has received a request <br />for site plan review from M & G Leasing. The site plan is proposing to construct a 7,800 square <br />foot office and trailers sales showroom facility. The area is generally located on the north side of <br />Highway #10, west of Ramsey Boulevard and east of Armstrong Boulevard. The site is zoned B- <br />3 Highway Business, office and showroom facilities are permitted in the Highway Business <br />district. The addition includes a 6,000 square foot trailer showroom area and a 1,800 square foot <br />office facility. The structure meets all Highway Business setback requirements and is in <br />compliance with the 35% lot coverage restriction. The site plan proposes to have two access <br />points fi'om State Highway #10. Minnesota Department of Transportation has reviewed M & G <br />Leasing's proposed site plan and will only be allowing one access from State Highway #10 at <br />either the east or west end of the property. All driveways and off-street parking areas will be <br />paved and finished with B-612 curbing. Screening is not required because the adjacent parcels <br />area also zoned Highway Business. The facility will be served by on-site sewer and water <br />facilities. The proposed double box parking lot lighting fixtures appear to meet City Code. The <br />Planning Commission recommended site plan approval contingent upon compliance with City <br />Staff review letter dated July 28, 2000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired about the statement in the MnDOT letter dated August 11, <br />2000 stating the following "In addition to these specific issues we would like to work with the <br />City in better managing the growing access to T.H. #10. Perhaps a more pro-active stance by the <br />City could consist of delaying issuance of building permits until proof is shown that all MnDOT <br />access and drainage permits have been obtained." <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that staff recently began including the <br />requirement in the Development Agreement. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that the City has its own study of the corridor under way as <br />well as a joint study with several cities which will probably include that the City spend money to <br />construct a frontage road and suggested that the Council consider language that at the time the <br />frontage road is constructed the applicant would give up the access to Highway #10 at no cost to <br />the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman replied that the City cannot take away the right of the property <br />owner. <br /> <br />City Council/August 22, 2000 <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />