10/12/88 Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10. That Section 170.015C enables the Council or the Planning Commission to determine whether the proposed use is or is not compatible for development within the zoning district. 11. That the surrounding properties are zoned I-l, Industrial except to the south which is zoned B-l, Business. 12. That the closest residential area is greater than 1/4 mile from the proposed landfill. i not~ d=n~erous ~u t}ra~p~blic 14. That the city's comprehensive plans indicate extension of the City's water service through the proposed landfill. 15. That the city's comprehensive plans indicate extension of sanitary sewer near the southern boundary of the parcel. 16. That the Highway 10 study proposes the extension of McKinley Street as a frontage road through the proposed parcel. 17. That the Airport Master Plan approved by the City indicates that approximately 50% of the existing parcel is recommended to be acquired as clear zone for Runway 34. ~o ~ 18. That approximately 25% of the parcel lies within the innermost 1000' of the existing clear zone for Runway 34. 19. That the applicant has stated that materials may be stockpiled and then buried once a year, perhaps in the fall (P.H. 9/8/88). 20. That the applicant has stated that waste concrete would be crushed by running over the material with a dozer during landfilling (P.H. 9/8/88). 21. That no other demolition landfills are currently pe.'-mitted within the city. 22. That a sanitary landfill is located approximately one mile north of this parcel.. Said landfill is currently in the process of application for a CUP to pe-~-mit vertical expansion. 23. That the material to be disposed of will be limited to that produced on site (P.H. 9/8/88). 24. Due to disposal of only on-site produced waste, no impacts are expected o~ adjoining roads or into and out cf %he si~e. 25. That the proposed landfill is/is not harmonious with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan. 2