Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson McDilda and Board Member Olds reside in Ward 4. Coordinator Anderson stated <br />that each Ward is represented by at least one Board member. <br /> <br />Board Member Max stated he would volunteer to contact Council Member Elvig in Ward 1. He <br />stated that the Council members could be contacted before the work plan goes before the City <br />Council for approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that it would be good to get input. She named each Ward <br />Councilmember. She added that the City has five year goals. She noted there probably is only <br />one goal that might he relevant to the EPB. She stated that the tasks in the work plan should fall <br />under that goal. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda asked how to get a copy of that goal. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson stated he could locate the 5-year goals. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda concurred with the idea. He directed Coordinator Anderson to find a copy <br />of those goals. Chairperson McDilda asked members of the EPB if there was interest in putting <br />together environmental recommendations regarding review of the grading policy. <br /> <br />Environmental Specialist Bacon stated that was a direct function of the Zoning Department. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson stated that would be a direct function of the Engineering Department. <br /> <br />Board Member Max stated that would be more interwoven and involve more people than the <br />wetlands issue. <br /> <br />Board Member McDilda concurred that this would be a fairly major undertaking that would flow <br />from year-to-year. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson stated that the Engineering Department would need to be involved. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda stated that it would be so intertwined with other things the EPB has been <br />working with. He asked if the Board Members would be interested in pursuing a grading policy. <br /> <br />Board Member Max proposed that something be put in the work plan to review the grading <br />policy with the potential to revise it in the following year. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda concurred with the idea adding a review of grading policy as a line item to <br />the work plan calendar for 2006. He asked if there were any other items on the calendar that <br />needed to be addressed for 2006. <br /> <br />Board Member Max asked what would happen when Environmental Specialist Bacon retires. He <br />asked if the EPB would be involved in the decision for input in the interview process. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda stated that he didn't think the EPB had any direction for input. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated it was a good question for the future of environmental <br />programming in the City. <br /> Environmental Policy Board / January 9, 2006 <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />