Laserfiche WebLink
league <br /> <br />February 9, 1981 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM:' <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />of minnesoba cibies <br /> <br />Mayors, Managers and Clerks <br /> <br />Peggy Flicker, Legislative Counsel <br /> <br />Governor's Budget Proposals for Local Government Aid <br /> <br /> 'nor Quie's budget proposals for 1982-1983 for local government aids will have a <br />~erious impact on cities' financial outlook. The Governor's proposal for local <br />government aid would 1) FREEZE the level of funding for local governmental aids; and <br />2) DELAY the distribution of aid payments to cities. <br /> <br />THE FREEZE <br /> <br />The Governor's budget proposes to fu'nd the local government aid formula at $270 <br />million dollars annually for 1982 and 1983..This is the same amount cities were <br />entitled to in 1981, before the Governor's 8.3% cutback. In other words, the <br />proposal is for no increase in funding for 1982 or 1983. The aid freeze means <br />that other revenue sources, primarily the property tax, will have to be tapped to <br />pay for increased operating costs. Either property taxes will rise at a rate faster <br />than inflation, services will be cut back, or capital expenditures deferred. <br /> <br />OThe enclosed chart projects the effect of the freeze on property taxes on a sample <br /> city assuming that property taxes plus state aids will continue to make up the same <br /> relative share of the city's total expenditures. We have assumed that inflation <br /> would cause expenditure increases of 12% in 1981, and 10% in 1982 and 1983. <br /> <br />THE DEL~AY <br /> <br /> Beginning in 1982, the Governor proposes to ~hange the aid payment schedule. , The <br /> Governor's proposal would eliminate the March payment entirely. Instead of four <br /> equal payments in March, July, September and November, cities would receive their <br /> aid payments in six equal monthly installments, to be paid in July through December <br /> of each year. Obviously, this will result in a financial cost for each city. Cities <br /> will lose the interest income that would otherwise be earned from investment of all <br /> or part of the March payment. The total amount of that lost interest is estimated <br /> to exceed $7.5 million statewide. In addition, some cities will also be forced to <br /> borrow to cover current expenses. Such borrowing will cause direct costs due to <br /> interest expense. An indirect, but potentially more harmful cost, is the possible <br /> effect which such borrowing has on the city'~ credit rating. <br /> (OVER) <br />300 hanover building. 480 cedar street, saint ~aul. minnesota 55101 (612) 22212881 <br /> <br /> <br />