My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/24/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 03/24/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:37:35 PM
Creation date
3/21/2006 1:40:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/24/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~r. Hutchinson stated he could cooperate if possible. <br />Councilwoman VanWagner asked if people have to be notified of DNRproposal <br />prior to submission. <br />Mr. Hutchinson stated no, it is not required. He further stated the final <br /> proposal would be presented to the Council prior to submission to the <br /> DNR. <br /> 3. FEASIBILITY REPORT ON PROPOSED STREET I~PROV~NT FOR PELTZER ADDITION. <br /> Background Information: Enclosure (D2-b) contains the City Engineer'S feasibility <br /> report on this proposed project that has been petitioned by the citizens who <br /> reside in the area. <br /> Council Discussion: The council should handle the easement problem for water problem and <br /> Eet a motion to this effect per the City Engineer. Councilmsn Sorteberg asked about <br /> voting. Mayor Gamec stated voting would be handled as a whole and as two <br /> separate areas. Councilman Cox asked about 149th Avenue road, is it included. <br /> Mayor Gamec stated it should be included. City Engineer stated cost for this <br /> higher rate due to commercial potential and it is a <br /> part would be 2.5 tim~Lec in uired if 149th shoal? be h~ndled as a separate issue. <br /> wider street. Mayor q . and the other <br /> Councilman Cox said by area, Limonite is non-petitioned area <br /> is a petitioned area and wants to know who will pay for 149th improvement. <br /> Motion by Councilman Sorteberg and seconded by Councilman Cox, the introduction <br /> end adoption of Resolution 81-9 receiving report and calling for a hearing on <br /> street improvements: <br /> 149th Avenue N.W.lying between Co. Rd. 56 (Ramsey Blvd. NW) and <br /> T.~monite Street N.W. <br /> 149th Lane N.W iyinE .between the SE Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, <br /> Range 25, lying East of Limonite Street <br /> 150th Avenue N.W. lying between Kamacite Street N.N. end Garnet St. <br /> 151st Avenue N.W. lying between Co. Rd. 56 (R~msey Blvd. N.W.) and Garnet <br /> St. N.W. <br /> Limonite St. N.W. lying between 149th Avenue N.W. end 151st Avenue N.W. <br /> Kamacite Street N.W. lying between 149th Lane N.W. and 151st Avenue <br /> Jaspar Street N.W. lying between 151st Avenue N.W..to a distance <br /> approximately 300 feet north of 151st Avenue N.W. <br /> Hematite Street N.b. lying in the SW Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, <br /> Range 25, lying North of 150th Avenue N.W. · <br /> o <br /> <br /> Garnet Street N.W. lying in the SW Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, <br /> Range 25, lying North and South of 151st Avenue N.W. <br /> C/M~rch 10, 1981 <br /> 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.