Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />June 1, 1981 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />A dispassionate examination of my activities on your behalf over these past half- <br />dozen months, nonetheless, would reveal a remarkable record of accomplishment. If <br />I have erred at all'in this it has been in not reporting to you my every activity, <br />my every conversation, my every'agreement arri'ved at with my-colleagues inregard <br />to our local government aids proposals. <br /> <br />My words are entirely inadequate, moreover, to express to you my sorrow that you, <br />lady and gentlemen of the Council, whom I know to be honest and intelligent people, <br />found it necessary to arraign and try me, find me guilty and sentence me, all in <br />absentia. I fould the registered letter format to be a further and unnecessary <br />degra-~ion. Particularly distressing is the fact that only two of you have ever <br />spoken personally to me about this matter; those two were free, of course, to make <br />a judgement for they alone had heard both sides of the story. But what can be <br />said of the majority who condemned me having sought and received testimony from <br />only one perspective of this very difficult and complex situation? Certainly not <br />that they acted in a manner consistent with the basic values of fair-plaY and <br />justice. <br /> <br /> Your action, in adopting the type of resolution you did and worded as it is, presents <br /> me with a number of difficulties. You have unilaterally violated my basic, often- <br /> expressed policy of cooperation with the units of local government in my district, <br /> you have clouded the issue of whether you wanted to procede legislatively with <br /> amendments to the local government aids statute. (You may, of course, choose to <br /> pursue the issue in the courts, as you have often suggested to me that you would.. <br /> But counsel advises me that the judge before whom you'd hear your case will want <br /> to have evidence in hand that the Legislature, confronted with the problem of <br /> inequity, refused to act. That your alternatives are exhausted. Clearly no legis- <br /> lative consideration has yet taken place. Alternatives have not been exhausted; <br /> thus you have put yourselve~ in a very difficult position should we decide not to <br /> pursue this legislation. It appears to me that a reasonable person could conclude <br />e that just as yo? stood on the brink.of legislative consideration of your petition, <br /> you, by resolution, sabotaged your own case.)' Your resolution has, additionally, <br /> damaged the credibility of the Minnesota League of Small Cities lobbying effort <br /> in the eyes of key legislators and staff persons with whom I have discussed it. <br /> <br />Thus, my job of presenting our proposed changes, should you ask me to continue in <br />it, is made immeasurably harder. Unless there is some redress, some understanding <br />we can arrive at in regard to this matter, you have made it difficult for your- <br />selves (and-possibly even the Minnesota League of Small Cities) to continue to <br />work with me on this legislation. At this point, regardless of whatever else <br />happens, it nowappears that'I will not be able to count on your aid and support <br />should I continue to press our proposals in the Legislature. <br /> <br /> <br />