Laserfiche WebLink
GENERAL CONCERNS <br /> <br />1. COMMUNITY INDEX <br /> <br />The AMM has major concerns relative to the Council's intent <br />to introduce the Community Index concept into the housing and <br />grant review process conducted by the Metropolitan Council. The <br />effectiveness of any tool used to promote and produce more <br />affordable housing within communities in the metropolitan area <br />depends a great deal on its creditability and acceptance by local <br />officials. Based on an extensive review of the written material <br />describing the Community Index and discussions with the Council's <br />Housing Staff, the AMM believes this concept is premature. To a <br />large extent, the index is based on a "snap shot in time" of the <br />existing housing already built in this area. Since the housing <br />already in place will provide the bulk of the housing stock for <br />at least the next ten (10) years, communities might be unfairly <br />penalized because of this. The existing housing is largely a <br />reflection of the market place and has little to do with the <br />"good" or "bad" intentions of local officials and they should not <br />be judged or held accountable for conditions over which they have <br />little or no control. Also~ the exact same house in different <br />areas might differ greatly in market Yalue because of the <br />influence of the market place and other intangibiles. <br /> <br />The AMM also questions the wisdom or fairness of judging every <br />community by the same standards since much of the housing type, <br />style and cost is a reflection of the market and has little to do <br />with planning. It almost appears that the intent of this index <br />is to make each and every city a microcosm of the region as whole <br />and the AMM does not believe this is necessary, advantages, or <br />even good public policy. <br /> <br />The AMM does believe that the information (data) contained in the <br />Community Index is useful planning information for city officials <br />and should be useful for internal planning purposes on a city by <br />city basis. However, the index should not be used as a "control <br />technique" by the Metropolitan Council at this time because of <br />its deficiencies and the many unanswered questions. <br /> <br />Recommendations: If the Metropolitan Council decides to proceed <br />with the "Community Index" concept, for a period of time (perhaps <br />two or three years) it should be used only as a bilateral <br />planning tool between the Metropolitan council and the local <br />communities. That is, when the Council reviews a local housing <br />project or proposal, the comments it makes based on the "Index" <br /> <br /> <br />