My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/13/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2006
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/13/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:18:46 AM
Creation date
5/17/2006 12:00:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
04/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case g4: Review Titterud Park RFP <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood reviewed that the Park and Recreation Commission <br />approved the Request For Proposal (RFP) for the replacement of play equipment at Titterud Park. <br />The RFP included the following items: <br /> · Protection of the oak trees in the area <br /> · Liquidated damages for any damage that might occur to the oak trees <br /> · Connection of the path to the parking lot that meets ADA requirements <br /> · Seating areas <br /> · Identification of whether some of the existing play equipment could be included <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood indicated the vendors were invited to meet with staff on <br />site to refine the proposals. Four RFP's were received by the City; however, two did not meet <br />the requirement regarding the trees. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer 1I Linton provided an overview of the four proposals received for the replacement <br />of the play equipment at Titterud Park. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns noted proposals that do not include the ADA pathway would result in <br />additional costs for the City to bear. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton explained part of the RFP indicated there would be a concrete border <br />around the area that would be installed by the City. The additional pathway to the parking lot <br />would not factor into proposals 3 and 4 as presented at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds inquired if the pathways are included in the first two proposals. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer 11Linton replied the pathways appear to be itemized in the first two proposals. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock inquired what type of ground surface was requested in the RFP's. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton replied the surface is required to meet ADA requirements and consumer <br />product safety standards. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood indicated the material will be wood fiber that is nm <br />through a special tumbling process to round off the edges. The City has moved away from pea <br />gravel, which gets quite compacted; it does not look as nice and gets quite hot, and is not able to <br />be accessed by wheelchairs. <br /> <br />The meeting was recessed at 7:18 p.m. in order for the Commission to review the proposals. The <br />meeting was reconvened at 7:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns indicated during the recess the Commission reviewed the submitted <br />proposals. The favored proposal of the Commission is titled Titterud Grove. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/April 13, 2006 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.