Agenda - Council - 11/28/2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The low bid received is reflected in the Schedule 1 bid and was submitted by Park Construction Company, of Minneapolis,MN in the amount of$6,737,287.45. This bid was approximately 38%higher than the Engineer's Estimate of$4,875,068.50 due mainly to highly inflated PVC pipe costs,which is reflected in both bids. Notification: Bids were advertised in Finance and Commerce and in the Anoka Union Herald on Friday, October 29, 2021, and on November 5, 2021. Bids were also advertised online on QuestCDN. Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: Observations: The bidding environment for utility pipes has grown increasingly volatile since 2020. This is due to an overall shortage of pipe and appurtenant materials for various material types. The 2020 winter ice storms caused refineries in Texas to shut down for an extended period of time,which resulted in a shortage of resin needed to manufacture plastic pipe that continues to this day. In addition, a general shortage of pipe and appurtenant materials exists due to continued supply chain disruptions caused primarily by a shortage of drivers resulting from the pandemic, as well as from previous shipping lane blockages and extreme weather events. All this is resulting in inflated pipe costs and long delays between the time materials are ordered and the time they are delivered. The attached memo from SEH's project manager further details the reasons for the volatile pipe bidding environment and goes on to say that at this time it is not known when this volatile bidding environment may subside. This project was ultimately bid to allow an extended bidding window of 2 months, and to allow bidders to substantially complete their work by mid-2023 so the trunk watermain will be operational before the new Water Treatment Plant is proposed to be commissioned in October of 2023. This was done to allow bidders as much time as possible to work with materials suppliers to receive the best bid prices possible. Unfortunately,both bids received were significantly higher that the engineer's estimate,with the low bid being $102,218.95 (38-percent)higher. Because of this and the other reasons noted in the attached bid rejection recommendation letter,the design engineer recommends rejecting both bids and not awarding a contract at this time to allow material and construction costs to be monitored during 2022 in anticipation that bidding the project again later in 2022 or in early 2023 will present more favorable bids and additional bidders to help reduce project costs. Since bids came in high for this project it is not unreasonable to expect inflated bids for the Water Treatment Plant as well. Staff therefore believes it is prudent to work to reduce costs for the both the Trunk Watermain Improvements and the Water Treatment Plant projects to avoid a need to further spend down existing sewer and water enterprise funds, or increase the amount we may need to bond for a portion of the improvements. Alternatives: Alternative#1 —Motion to adopt Resolution#22-03 3 rejecting bids for the Water Treatment Plant Trunk Watermain Improvements, Improvement Project#21-08, and authorizing Staff to work with SEH, Inc. to revise the approved plans to reduce project costs and to monitor the bidding environment to identify the most favorable time to bid the project again. Alternative#2—Motion of other. Funding Source: