Laserfiche WebLink
wants to ensure that there are adequate provisions in place to prevent oak wilt. She expressed <br />concern over the length of the driveways and how it relates to off-street parking, especially in the <br />cottage units. And she was still not convinced that the south-west trail connection was necessary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he felt that the proposed density was too high since the <br />development is surrounded by lots that are 10,800 square feet. He inquired as to why the <br />developer was proposing lot sizes as small as 5,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig noted that he wanted to make sure that the proposed mm radiuses will <br />work for emergency vehicles and Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler replied that they <br />would. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig stated that he could understand that the south east trail is being proposed <br />to create a loop, but he would like there be some type of outlet to connect over to Potassium <br />Street. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook stated that he likes the trail as proposed on the south end of the property, <br />but if they are not going to put a trail in the back of the homes there should be a connection to the <br />sidewalks with the development over to Potassium Street. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec questioned ii' the trail on the south of the property was necessary with the <br />inclusion of sidewalks within the development. <br /> <br />Majority consensus of the Council was to eliminate the trail from Sunwood Drive to Tungsten. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that on February 13, 2003, the Park Commission <br />recommended preliminary plat approval, but felt that the trail to the south was very important and <br />that it should be included as originally planned. It is an area where children do have to walk to <br />school and the trail will provide a walking area for those children. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that the issue of children walking to school was a good point, <br />especially since there are no sidewalks in the existing neighborhood. <br /> <br />Councihnember Pearson stated that he has heard arguments on both sides, but the Park <br />Commission was pretty insistent that the trail be included. Personally he would not like a trail in <br />his backyard, but he would have to agree with the Park Commission and go in favor of the trail <br />on the south end of the property. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that the Park Commission did feel strongly that it was an <br />important piece of infrastructure for the community. <br /> <br />Neil Horn, 6031 145th Lane NW, stated that having a trail in his back yard creates a safety <br />problem. They will have people riding bikes and walking on the trail going through their <br />backyards and how do they keep dogs from going on their property or his own dog from leaving <br />his property. Mr. Horn felt that it would make more sense to have a sidewalk on 145th Lane. He <br /> <br />City Council/February 25, 2003 <br /> Page 9 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />