Laserfiche WebLink
Roadway Network <br /> A total of six forecast scenarios were prepared for the CSAH 5 Corridor Traffic Study. This includes <br /> existing year 2018 conditions along with five scenarios representing future year 2040 conditions. The <br /> following scenarios were included in the CSAH 5 Corridor Traffic Study: <br /> • Existing (2018) -year 2018 SE data and the year 2018 roadway network <br /> • 2040 No Improvement—year 2040 SE data with year 2018 roadway network <br /> • 2040 Baseline — year 2040 SE data with all programmed improvements; CSAH 5 as 2-lane <br /> undivided with 8-foot shoulders <br /> • 2040 Alternative 1 — year 2040 SE data; CSAH 5 as 2-lane rural section with painted center <br /> median, 8-foot shoulders, and left and/or right turn lanes at major intersections <br /> • 2040 Alternative 2 — year 2040 SE data; CSAH 5 as 2-lane rural section with a raised center <br /> median, 8-foot shoulders, and left and/or right turn lanes at major intersections <br /> • 2040 Alternative 3 — year 2040 SE data; CSAH 5 as 4-lane rural section with a raised center <br /> median, 8-foot shoulders, and left and/or right turn lanes at major intersections <br /> Additionally, the following programmed roadway capacity improvements within the study area were <br /> incorporated into the ABM roadway network for the year 2040 Baseline and Alternative Scenarios: <br /> • Highway 47 and County Road 116/Bunker Lake Boulevard intersection improvements <br /> • Highway 47/169 resurfacing <br /> • Highway 10 Ramsey Boulevard /Sunfish Lake Boulevard interchange construction <br /> • Highway 10 Rum River bridge replacement and corridor improvements <br /> • Fairoak/Thurston/U Main Street interchange construction <br /> • Highway 47 BNSF Railroad grade separation <br /> • Highway 10 strategic congestion mitigation <br /> • Highway 10 at Round Lake Boulevard intersection improvements <br /> • Highway 169 Redefine/freeway construction <br /> Travel Demand Model Validation <br /> For this study, the ABM validation was reviewed in the study area shown in Figure 1. Validation is <br /> defined as the degree to which the travel demand model replicates known ground counts. The traffic <br /> counts used for the validation were obtained from the MnDOT Traffic Forecasting and Analysis <br /> published data. Based on the ABM validation review completed for this study, the model validates to <br /> accepted industry standards. <br /> Traffic Forecast Results <br /> Daily traffic forecasts were prepared for the No Improvement scenario to capture the growth in the <br /> study area due to development growth.The No Improvement scenario forecasts are shown in Figure 2. <br /> 11 <br />