My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/11/99
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Public Safety Board
>
Minutes
>
1990's
>
1999
>
03/11/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2025 3:56:13 PM
Creation date
5/29/2003 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Public Safety Board
Document Date
03/11/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
like to put this item in front of the City Council on March 23 and ask to go out for bids. <br />We would like to see $230,000, no more. The timeline would be eight to 12 months from <br />the order to delivery. <br /> <br />Upon inquiry by A1 Pearson, Dave Lewandowski explained why they should order a tilt <br />cab instead of a regular cab. <br /> <br />Tom Anderson stated he agrees with the specs. <br /> <br />Carl Grassl stated that when it involves public safety, he does not feel people really care <br />what you spend. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec and seconded by A1 Pearson to recommend going forward and <br />bringing the bidding issue to the City Council. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Boardmembers Pearson, Anderson, Grassl, <br />Lewandowski and Way. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberHendriksen. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Discussion of Extent Public Safety Board will be Involved in Fire <br />Station #2 <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated that this item is just for discussion. Once we decide the location <br />of Fire Station No. 2, he wants to know how this Board wants to be involved. The <br />architect will design the building and bring it back for approval. He asked if the Board <br />wants to be involved at that point. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec felt that after the architect has come up with the plan, then this group <br />would review it and be able to suggest changes. He felt it is a good idea to have <br />knowledge of what is happening, <br /> <br />Tom Anderson stated that the information and support is a good concept but cautioned <br />the Board getting too involved. For example - fire truck - yes, there is a need for it, but <br />he feels the Board does not need to get involved in the specs of it. The dangers of getting <br />into the position where the Board becomes too involved are oversight - we are "non- <br />pros". We would be "pooling ignorance" rather than expertise. We need to be careful of <br />what we decide. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec agreed. <br /> <br />Carl Grassl stated we may not have a lot of information/input on what the truck should <br />look like but he feels it is a positive to have some support. We ran it in front of the <br />citizens - to support the need is good. <br /> <br />Jim Way stated that by bringing it here tonight, we can prepare ourselves for what the <br />City Council may ask - it's nice to be prepared ahead of time. <br /> <br />Public Safety Board - March 11, 1999 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.