My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/21/1999 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1999
>
Minutes - Council - 12/21/1999 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 4:15:50 PM
Creation date
5/30/2003 9:24:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
12/21/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />occur is prior to March 31, 2000. Any delay in the acquisition of the right-of-way may cause <br />the bid schedule to slip, and the City would then lose the additional federal funds. The other <br />issue is the required completion of right-of-access and right-of-way. A further update is that <br />TAB recently voted to remove the December 31 st deadline. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />When does the Court require the deposit of funds for the right-of-way and right-of-access <br />acquisitions? City Attomey Goodrich explained when the City wants access. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if the Court requires the condemnation funds be deposited by <br />the end of the year. <br /> <br />. Would MnDOT agree to cover the construction engineering and inspection, which has been <br />estimated at $260,000? MnDOT has agreed to cover the in-construction costs for the T.R. <br />#47 portion of the project and will attempt to get the agreement in writing. <br /> <br />. Has the State made a final decision on the signalization of the 142"d Avenue NW <br />intersection? If the signalization does not occur, would MnDOT support the extension of the <br />median through the 142"d Avenue NW intersection? Ifso, would MnDOT be willing to allow <br />four through-lanes in the area or contribute more funding to the project. MnDOT would be <br />in favor of extending the median through the intersection. The funding level would remain <br />the same. If the City desired to include two through-lanes in each direction with this project, <br />MnDOT staff may not object to the change in design; however, Metropolitan Council may <br />not allow it. All costs would be borne by the City. The project development reports would <br />need to be revised, and it is estimated that this would set the project back six to eight months. <br />Because of the delay, the project would lose the additional federal funding. <br /> <br />CounQilmember Hendriksen stated that there needs to be better clarification from the Met <br />Council. Are they opposed to having 142"d opened and unsignalized. <br /> <br />. Determine the amount of assistance from Anoka County for the T.H. #47 project. The City <br />Administrator has set a meeting with the County Commissioner Dennis Berg to discuss a <br />financial commitment from Anoka County for the T.H. #47 project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that staff should investigate why MnDOT is demanding to <br />purchase right-of-access at the City's cost when they are not purchasing right-of-way in their <br />areas, <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that he will work with Levine on the issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he would also like to find out if MnDOT has funded <br />overpasses over state roads, like Highway #10. <br /> <br />City Council/December 21,1999 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.