Minutes - Public Works Committee - 05/16/2006

Home

Public Works Director Olson stated the ordinance is very specific about the percent of impervious surface and how the rates are calculated. In most cases communities that have implemented stormwater utility fees have identified land classes and made assumptions based on the percent of impervious surface. Ramsey calculated each property, which was extremely time consuming, but also extremely accurate. Councilmember Pearson inquired about the amount of adjustment that could be received if the site meets the criteria of the credit application. Public Works Director Olson reviewed the available credits, which total 50% that is available in credits, none of which have been applied for in this case. Mr. Rowe stated when he inquired about the possibility of using the pond for his drainage area, rather than the expense of building a pond, he was informed by staff that it could be done except that he does not own all the land surrounding it. Public Works Director Olson stressed that water needs to be cleaned before it drains to a wetland. That is not to say the pond cannot be used for credits, but there would need to be complete control of the drainage; this pond could not be maintained because it cannot be dug out every few years. Chairperson Elvig noted the first issue is the drainage into the pond, which would need to be facilitated by the WMO or DNR. Mr. Rowe may be able to obtain an easement to drain to this pond, but the DNR will likely require that a pond be dug to treat the water before it goes into that wetland. Mr. Rowe stated that water from homes and driveways drain into the wetlands. Fire Chief Kapler explained developers are required to apply for ponding when a new housing development is built, and every house is part of that drainage system. Mr. Rowe stated he is not against paying a fee, but this rate has gone up too much, too fast; the increase should be reasonable. Public Works Director Olson encouraged Mr. Rowe to apply for the available credits, although there will be improvements required to obtain the credits. He explained by going through site plan approval for the extension of existing buildings they can plan for the improvements and point the individual in the right direction when entering into a project, rather than after the fact. Chairperson Elvig noted the possibility of a linear pond on the site. Motion by Chairperson Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to recommend to the City Council that the appeal by Mr. Rowe be denied and the property be billed at the new rate of $2,953.69/qtr, and that the rate can be adjusted if the site meets the criteria on the credit application. Public Works Committee / May 16, 2006 Page lOof16