Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'I. Plan is unacceptable to Flintwood I residents bordering <br />the FlintwoOd II development. <br /> <br />A. Reduction in property value in Flintwood I.' <br /> <br />"Extreme reduction in my case." <br /> <br />'1. Low cost/high density housing (row houses. very small <br />qud homes, apartment buildings). <br /> <br />2. FlintwoOd II development incompatible with exisitng <br />FlintwoOd I development (the above structures border <br />existing urban 1 acre lots without any buffer zone <br />or open space). <br /> <br />3. Many mature trees would have to be removed.' <br /> <br />"All trees in the case of FlintwoOd 5th; I have a beautiful ,,'ooded/grass <br />yard.1t <br /> <br />'E. Loss of privacy/quality of life. <br /> <br />1. lligh population denisty on small lots immediately <br />bordering existing FlintwOOd I lots without buffer. <br /> <br />a. Fopulation density of FlintwoOd I is approximately <br />3 people/acre.' <br /> <br />"In Flintwood 5th, 30-50/acre versus 2/acre." <br /> <br />-0. Fopulation density bordering Flintwood II development <br />would be approximately 36-50 people/acre, not <br />counting the apartments. <br /> <br />2. Commercial and apartment property butting up against <br />existing FlintwoOd I lots. <br /> <br />a. Farking lots bordering Flintwood I lots. <br />b. Increase in noise, strange people and general loss <br />of sereneity, as well as unpleasant view.' <br /> <br />"In F1intwood 5th, add item (c) )'ard lights eliminating nil;htime darkness." <br /> <br />'3. Many residents would feel compelled to mOVe out.' <br /> <br />flI 'illS). move out.1I <br /> <br />'c. The planned development would cause a drainage problem or <br />cause unnecessary drain pipe expense and loss of woods. <br /> <br />1. Half of Flintwood I is now drained naturally by a ditch <br />fer free.' <br /> <br />F & Z/Fublic llearin,;/Decet:lber 1, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />E>O <br />