My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/22/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 08/22/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:48:49 PM
Creation date
8/18/2006 2:05:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/22/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-178- <br />Mr. McDonald stated the problem was this was a land purchase or an access easement. <br />Engineer Jankowski stated he had questions about the other utilities. He asked why couldn't <br />there be -a future building proposed where the utilities were being shown. <br />Mr. McDonald responded they did provide to a certain extent some conceptual idea of what <br />would occur. He indicated this was to their best guess as to what might go in there. He stated <br />where they put the utilities was a logical conclusion and the utilities might be offset a little more <br />when the design was finalized. He noted there. were multiple options on how to get to other <br />places and they tried to leave themselves those options for various buildings. <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted if a similar development were proposed south of this <br />development, the utilities would be under that building. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the idea of having the curb and gutter was to provide an edge for <br />snowplowm .and prevent„erosion. e asked if those were, serious enough concerns that they had <br />to keep them. <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated bituminous curb he did not have good experience wi , but <br />ffi <br />perhaps hey coulcLreach a com -tonuse with a more substantial tituminousa.curl .to get.hsome <br />materiaL ehin <br />Commissioner <br />developer on t <br />Planning Commission /August 3, 2006 <br />Page 3 of 19 <br />could approve <br />City Engineer Jankowski responded they coul do that. <br />Mr McDonald stated he would agree to this He stated with respect to West Ramsey Parkway <br />constructii n, t o strupt xt all of tl?e ay bail to T©uun Cent 4Y1 her e wa4wi at Bough <br />development to pay for the road. He stated this would be an extreme hardship. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated this was a condition and his thoughts were that sometimes you bend and <br />sometimes you didn't, like on major infrastructure. He stated his personal opinion was that this <br />was significant and he would not abandon this condition. <br />Mr. McDonald stated there needed to be some discussion regarding this. <br />Chairperson Nixt stated it was up to him to bring the players up to the table and they have a <br />conversation. He stated they needed to know what the proposal was before they could respond. <br />Mr. McDonald stated he would bring this back to staff for a discussion. <br />Commissioner Brauer asked what there was to negotiate. He stated either this went all of the <br />way through or part of the way through and then asked how did they determine which part went <br />part way through. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.