My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
governments,private business, and non-profit organizations that comprise the cross-sector <br /> collaboration that allow the successful creation of public art projects in small communities. <br /> The role of government's influence on public art policy echoes the relationship of the <br /> public to other sectors found in classic public policy discussions. Lindblom (195 9) developed <br /> theories that included discussion of the differences in centrally planned societies and"mutually <br /> adjusted" societies. This concept postulates that governing bodies largely decide public policy <br /> by a series of decisions referred to by Lindblom as mutual adjustment. He argued that all <br /> societies are a mixture of both government and markets sectors, only separated by a matter of <br /> degree. That is, government will take over market responsibilities and the market will take over <br /> government responsibilities only to a certain extent. He contends that it is largely the role of <br /> government to curb the power and unbridled enthusiasm of market forces. On the other hand, he <br /> points out that our democracy creates large policy-making systems that are complex and hard to <br /> understand, making it difficult for the average person to participate. Recent public art initiatives <br /> have sought to incorporate the voice of the average person through collaborative and <br /> participatory art creation. <br /> Kwon (2004, p.60) states that three distinct paradigms can be identified in the history of <br /> the modern public art movement in the United States. First, is the art in public places model <br /> exemplified by Calder's La Grande Vitesse in Grand Rapids Michigan (1964), the first sculpture <br /> to be completed through the Art-in-Public-Places Program of the National Endowment for the <br /> Arts (NEA). Second, the art-as-public-spaces focused on design-oriented urban sculpture with <br /> functional elements such as street furniture, bicycle racks, landscape features, or structural <br /> architectural elements. Finally, the art-in-the-public-interest model, the label of which Kwon <br /> (2004, p. 60) credits to art critic Arlene Raven, and related to the concept of"new genre public <br /> 62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.