My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/03/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/03/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:51:30 PM
Creation date
9/29/2006 3:05:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/03/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition to reviewing the previously mentioned Target Group, a group of <br />similarly sized high-growth Cities were also examined. This group (referred to <br />as the "Peer Group"), consists of the following cities: <br />• Andover, 30,000 <br />• Shakopee, 29,000 <br />• Savage, 24,850 <br />• Chanhassen, 23,652 <br />• Chaska, 22,500 <br />• Rosemount, 20,900 <br />The intent of comparing Ramsey to these similar high-growth cities was to look <br />for staffing and service level trends particular to communities in the early <br />stages of high-growth, trends which may not be apparent in the more fully - <br />developed Target Group. <br />The trend most readily apparent in the comparison between the peer group and <br />the Target Group is the higher level of staffing in the areas directly affected by <br />the rate of growth occurring in each of these cities. The areas of planning, <br />building inspection, and engineering are the areas where the Peer Group and <br />Ramsey had higher staffing levels then the Target Group. The staffing levels in <br />these departments are a direct reflection of the growth that is occurring, and are <br />affected prior to an actual rise in population. <br />Comparison to Target Group <br />When comparing Ramsey to its selected Target Group, one trend was readily <br />apparent: in those areas where Ramsey presently has services and programs in <br />place, its staffing levels are on par with the Target Group. In relation to <br />employees per 1,000 population, Ramsey's current staffing levels are <br />appropriate and in line with providing the high service level it desires. The City <br />will need to add staff in other areas as discussed below; however, in the areas <br />where it currently has programs, maintaining the current ratio of employees per <br />1,000 population as it grows should enable the City to continue to provide high <br />service levels. <br />The spreadsheets accompanying this report illustrate the personnel growth <br />necessary to maintain the current staffing and service levels, which, as <br />previously noted, are adequate to provide high quality service. Additionally, <br />the spreadsheets illustrate the necessary growth of departmental budgets <br />resulting from staff growth. The spreadsheets reflect the addition of staff in <br />relation to population growth to maintain the ratio of employees per 1,000 <br />population currently present within the City. Ramsey has established a solid <br />foundation for providing high service levels. The key will be to maintain these <br />service levels and employee ratios as the City grows, while adding additional <br />programs and departments as deemed necessary. <br />City of Ramsey — Organization Study and Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.