My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:52:30 PM
Creation date
10/20/2006 3:17:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/24/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Trites Rolle, Brauer, <br />Cleveland, Hunt, and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Levine. <br />The public hearing closed at 9:19 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Nixt called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at <br />9:19 p.m. <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Trites <br />fro Rolle, t recommend that <br />e <br />City Council grant the applicant's request to rezone property t E-1 p final plat Em ymen <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD), contingent on the applicant fro <br />approval for the subject development. <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the PUD allows the City the <br />flexibility tom discuss they impact of °landYscaping with :the zapplicant T`Ass iciate "Planner <br />Dallies replied the PUD reserves the City the right to require additional performance <br />standards. Chairperson Nixt noted these requirements would be i included <br />land captg <br />Commissioner Van Scoy questioned if there will be a conflict ce <br />requirements due to the additional space the Commission hhas u eq <br />buildings ,, Nixt indicated the applicant is required to .meet the landscaping <br />t <br />reg cements YR ]fig i ncluded in the Staff Review L g A St ffas � e 11 nl g t i <br />there are a1s�a the additional trees that were P , r : i s <br />PP rk with the <br />a lcant to ' accommodate° th tr ees in areas- t hhat currently have n ; landscapin <br />Commiss oner :: Cleveland inquire g. <br />y <br />d >.abouf requiringa110 r U la replied a g e capin by <br />railroad that woul help with the buffering. Associate s <br />walk; is proposed all along this area. Chairperson Nixt noted tth <br />Commission s nd El the <br />recommended approval of the preliminary plat contingen t on the <br />Staff Review Letter,. which include thealand "scaping plan. x x <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Trites Rolle, Cleveland, <br />Hunt, and Van Scoy. Voting No: Commissioner Brauer. Absent: Commissioner <br />Levine. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.