My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/05/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/05/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:52:52 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 8:56:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/05/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Trites Rolle noted the units of concern would be 7, 13, 10 and 11. She asked if <br />there will be enough room for a fire truck to maneuver the turn next to units 10 and 11. <br /> <br />Mr. Campbell replied the site has been laid out to accommodate a turn by a fire truck. <br /> <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle expressed her support in the concept of the development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt stated he agrees there is potential for an occasional traffic jam, but with the <br />type of business that is planned to utilize this development, that will be the exception rather than <br />the rule. There is enough parking space to provide other areas for parking off of the street if <br />someone needs to park for any length of time, and there was the suggestion of creating additional <br />parking in an outlot. He asked if there are options for the developer to control any problems with <br />tenants blocking the street, such as through the association. <br /> <br />Mr. Ness replied he is working with a development company that specializes in putting together <br />associations, and has asked them to put together bylaws. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland suggested expanding the greenspace near the railroad tracks. <br /> <br />Mr. Campbell indicated the design can be amended to include another two feet in width on the <br />road. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted this expansion would at least comply with the 28 foot width requirement. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated it should be understood the site will still need to comply with <br />the landscaping requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Walz noted it had been stated they would be allowed to put some landscaping in the <br />easement area. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt commented this will be a fairly crowded bituminous laden area. Staff had <br />recommended tabling this due to the septic system, which has been discussed as being approved <br />with contingencies. The issues related to traffic flow have been discussed. He asked if the <br />applicant has any issues with the Staff Review Letter other than the landscaping plan and septic <br />issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Walz replied the main issue was the septic system. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated the developer has agreed to construct 156th Avenue. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired about elevations for the development. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes replied the standard for the E-l District area is pretty loose. It will be <br />verified that the architectural standards are met, but the standards can be increased as this is a <br />PUD. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 5, 2006 <br />Page 16 of20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.