Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Associate Planner DaInes replied the Staff Review Letter would likely include a paragraph <br />stating the information regarding the soil is satisfactory and can now move forward to City <br />Council. Chairperson Nixt requested clarification that the Commission will not receive detailed <br />information to provide direction to the applicant, and if the plat is changed the Council will <br />return it to the Planning Commission. Associate Planner DaInes responded in the affirmative. <br />Chairperson Nixt expressed his preference to include the septic design as a contingency, rather <br />than tabling action and delaying this process. Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the contingency <br />will cover the concerns of staff. City Engineer Jankowski replied the contingency would be an <br />acceptable way for the Planning Commission to proceed. He noted there are often contingencies <br />based on issues such as receipt of a WMO permit to be certain that storm sewer needs are met. <br />Chairperson Nixt noted there are many contingencies based on government actions. While he <br />respects the position of the motion he does not know that they would receive any more <br />information than is often the case with any number of third party approvals. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Commissioners Brauer and Cleveland. Voting No: Chairperson <br />Nixt, Commissioners Hunt, Trites Rolle, and Van Scoy. Absent: Commissioner Levine. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Trites Rolle, to recommend preliminary <br />plat and site plan approval for Northfork Office Condos contingent on compliance with the City <br />Staff Review Letter dated September 26, 2006, and contingent on the applicant's delivery of <br />information satisfactory to City staff regarding the location, size, design, and integrity of the <br />community septic system, both as a primary and alternate site. This includes the testing, sizing <br />assumptions, specification of locations, and identification of responsible party for management <br />and maintenance of the community septic system. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Trites Rolle, Hunt, and Van <br />Scoy. Voting No: Commissioners Brauer and Cleveland. Absent: Commissioner Levine. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request to Rezone Property from E-l Employment to Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD); Case of St. Andrews Investment Group, LLC <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Planning Commission meeting at 9: 18 p.m. in <br />order to call the public hearing to order. <br /> <br />Public Hearin2 <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 9: 18 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated the applicant is seeking a rezoning to Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) to accommodate 15 lots on 8 acres. The total development area to be <br />rezoned is approximately 11 acres, and includes Outlot A and Lot 2, Block 1 of West Ramsey <br />Industrial Park. The applicant wishes to develop 15 buildings on Outlot A, which is 8.44 acres. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 5, 2006 <br />Page 18 of 20 <br />