Laserfiche WebLink
Haviland Fields Development <br />Finding of Facts and Record of Decision <br />Name <br />Comment <br />Response <br />(church property). The LOS data on traffic flow at A. should be estimated 10% higher <br />This fine for 2023 but not for 2027. The LOS for the than the current design includes. <br />latter date is also A, which I believe is a gross error. It <br />should be either C or D. I currently live at Stoney River <br />& see the actual traffic every AM & know that the real <br />traffic loads as shown on the data report can't be <br />correct. I request that more info be obtained at this <br />intersection. Thank you. DD <br />Alexandria St Dear Mr Larson Comment noted. <br />John I am writing to express my vehement objection to the <br />proposed development of the Lord of Life property in <br />our community. As a concerned resident, I feel <br />compelled to outline the potential devastating impact <br />this development could have on our surrounding <br />communities, families, and neighbors. <br />First and foremost, the increase in traffic, landscape <br />alterations, and population growth resulting from this <br />development will undoubtedly disrupt the peaceful <br />and safe environment that we currently enjoy. The <br />influx of additional vehicles will lead to congestion, <br />making it harder for residents to commute and risking <br />the safety of pedestrians, especially children and <br />elderly individuals. <br />Furthermore, the proposed development does not <br />seem to align with the recent developments in <br />surrounding communities, which have not shown a <br />need for such expansion. Instead, it appears to be <br />driven by developers' interests without considering <br />the genuine needs and desires of the families in our <br />community. <br />Speaking of which, I want to emphasize that the <br />families in our neighborhood do not want this <br />development. Many of the residents have made their <br />voices heard in various forums, expressing their strong <br />opposition to this project. It is crucial to respect the <br />wishes of the community members who will be <br />directly affected by this development. <br />The potential consequences of this development <br />extend beyond mere inconvenience; it has the <br />potential to push the area to be overpopulated, <br />leading to the displacement of many long-standing <br />residents. Moreover, our already burdened schools <br />would be overwhelmed by the influx of new students, <br />making it challenging for them to provide quality <br />education. <br />Another grave concern is the increase in crime that <br />often accompanies rapid urbanization and population <br />growth. The introduction of a large development like <br />this can bring in outsiders and transient populations, <br />leading to potential security risks and jeopardizing the <br />safety of our families. <br />Anonymous To Whom it May Concern, Comment noted. TIF assistance from <br />(Ramsey Minnesota Rule 4410.1100 requires that EAWs shall the city has not been approved. <br />Resident) address "known government approvals, reviews, or <br />12 <br />