My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001 Correspondence
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Correspondence
>
2001 Correspondence
>
2001 Correspondence
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2014 1:00:13 PM
Creation date
12/7/2006 7:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
eeo (9 Ramaeet <br />14100 ST. FRANCIS BLVD. N. W. <br />ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 <br />427 -1410 <br />January 30, 1975 <br />- 2 - <br />the basis of the year 2050 population, but that facilities to which that <br />sewage would be •discharged would be designed on the basis of an estimated <br />year 2030 population of 14,900. <br />The result of this manipulation of numbers is that it is proposed to size <br />the facility which would receive Ramsey's sewage on the basis of a popula- <br />tion Ramsey expects before 1990 and a reader of the narrative report would <br />be led to believe that the system will be adequate for all of Ramsey's pro - <br />jected sewage flow until the year 2050. <br />We would point out to the Commission and the Metropolitan Council that the <br />source of both the year 2030 and 2050 population projections tabulated in <br />the report is the same agency that projected a 1985 population in Ramsey <br />that was exceeded in 1973. <br />It is our belief that a reasonable population projection for the year 2050 <br />for the city of Ramsey would be at least 58,500. <br />In the course of Ramsey's incorporation proceedings, an expert from the <br />Metropolitan Council characterized the Council's latest population projec- <br />tions as the population objectives of the Council's planners. <br />The use of such totally unsupportable planning objectives for a facility <br />as expensive and as permanent as an interceptor sewer system approximately <br />15 miles long without any of the controls necessary to achieve those <br />objectives is extremely short - sighted. This is particularly true in the <br />case of Ramsey which is at the extremity of the entire interceptor system <br />and which is located upstream from the entire metropolitan area where an <br />undersized sewerage facility will create the very problem the Metropolitan <br />Council and Waste Control Commission are charged to prevent and eliminate. <br />We would hasten to add at this point that we would not want to see any unit <br />of government with the powers necessary to control the population of every <br />one of it's governmental subdivisions within the limits currently being <br />suggested by the Metropolitan Council staff. <br />A second point of concern to Ramsey is the presentation of alternates for <br />the Anoka segment of the proposed interceptor system. <br />XII -30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.