2001 Correspondence - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

e ee O rRatitelay 14100 ST. FRANCIS BLVD. N. W. ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 427 -1410 January 30, 1975 - 3 - The map showing the alternative interceptor routes would indicate a capacity in the existing Anoka Northeast Interceptor that is 3.37 times the capacity to be provided for the same area in Andover that would be served by the Ramsey Interceptor. In addition, neither route has taken into account the value of local benefit at this point. The obvious conclusion that can be drawn from'the capacity discrepancy is that if one of the facilities is of proper capacity, the other is either significantly oversized or significantly undersized. It is requested that a detailed explanation of this discrepancy be included in the final Facilities Planning Report. Along with the capacity discrepancy in this comparison is a question of a scheduling discrepancy. The progress report indicates that facility R -1000 will not be required until 1995, but implies that the facility A -1000 series which would serve the same area in Andover is to be scheduled with the Anoka Interceptor. If both facilities are to provide service in response to the same needs, it seems logical that they would both be scheduled at the same time and that both would have the same capacity. A final point in this comparison is that there is a combination of lines - A -2000 and the A -1000 series that should be compared in the overall project comparison. - A concern of the city of Ramsey that is directly related to the proposed interceptor system, but is not addressed in any way in the Progress Report is the question of sanitary sewer service to the property in the vicinity of the Anoka Landfill. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has been utilizing this site for the disposal of liquid sludge from the Anoka sewage treatment plant for a considerable period of time. This use has been outside the original under- standing between the City of Anoka and Ramsey for use of the landfill site and it is understood that this use has been without permits required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. XII -31