My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001 Correspondence
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Correspondence
>
2001 Correspondence
>
2001 Correspondence
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2014 1:00:13 PM
Creation date
12/7/2006 7:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Metropolitan Council Meeting of March 28, 2001 <br />"That the Metropolitan Council authorize its Regional Administrator to execute a contract <br />amendment with Laidlaw Transit Services to provide services in the St. Croix Valley area, <br />(Routes 245 & 246) from April 2, 2001, to March 31, 2003, in an amount not to exceed <br />$802,855, plus marketing costs of $5,000 per year." <br />Motion carried. <br />Other Business <br />Update Riverview Corridor Appointments <br />Rich Rovang introduced Molly Grove, Metro Transit's Community Outreach Coordinator working on the <br />Riverview Corridor. He explained that the in January the Council approved a contract with the consultant <br />URS BRW to prepare the environmental impact statement for this project and conduct the preliminary <br />design for the corridor. He explained the key alternatives that were discussed. At that time, the Council <br />directed the staff to develop a strong and adequate public involvement process that represents the primary <br />activity that will be conducted through the study and would include three advisory committees. <br />Molly Grove explained that the three committees that make up the backbone of the public involvement <br />process include 1) a Corridor Management Committee, chaired by Chair Mondale, that will provide <br />study oversight; 2) a Technical Advisory Group that will be delving into the technical issues and <br />questions; and 3) a Riverview Citizens Workgroup that will begin meeting very soon. Staff was directed <br />to be proactive in making sure that the public had ample opportunities to participate in the discussions <br />surrounding the Riverview Corridor. A list of the 22 members and 5 alternates of the Riverview Citizen <br />Workgroup was distributed to Council members. The committee will be chaired by Council Member <br />Hornstein and will report back to the Corridor Management Committee and the Metropolitan Council <br />Transportation Committee directly. She noted that there are high expectations that members of the <br />workgroup will be very active on the workgroup and within the community talking with the authorities <br />and community organizations that appointed them and city council members to exchange information and <br />feedback on this project. She noted that the public involvement plan includes a website that should be <br />ready next week to keep the public informed, a hotline and numerous letters. There will be surveys and <br />focus groups, along with a number of public hearings. She reported that the first orientation meeting for <br />the citizen workgroup is scheduled for this Saturday, March 31, from 9:30 to noon at the West Seventh <br />Community Center in St. Paul. <br />Hornstein reported that he has had some preliminary meetings with the staff and he felt it was going to be <br />a good process that will bring about good outcomes in and for the community. <br />Hugunin asked if staff had followed -up with those individuals who appeared before the Transportation <br />Committee and Council to ensure that they had an opportunity to be involved in the appointment process <br />and be represented on the committees. Staff responded that each community council within the corridor <br />has two representatives on the committee and the various city council wards (2, 3 & 7) also have both a <br />citizen appointment and a key employer appointment. She explained that she had also been out talking <br />with all the community councils with one of the individuals who had appeared at several meetings so that <br />they would be well aware of the process. <br />Discussion of Whether or not to Close the Meeting to Discuss Attorney - Client Privileged Matters <br />and Litigation Issues Relating to Metropolitan Council v. Lake and Hennepin Associates L.L.P. <br />et al, Regarding Condemnation Action <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.