Laserfiche WebLink
<br />09/05/~0 TUE 12:05 FAX 651 490 2150 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />SEH <br /> <br />I{fJUUJ <br /> <br />Mr. James Noonan <br />September S, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />· Local Plan Review; <br />. Regional controls related to non point source pollution; and <br />· Consistency with City Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The water resources management plan and all subsequent amendments will become part <br />of the City's Comprehensive Plan (adopted by reference), in accordance with <br />Environmental Review 21040, 1995 revisions to Minnesota Statutes 103B.235, Subd. 3A <br />and 473.859, Subd. 2 (Chapter 176, Laws of Minnesota 1995). <br /> <br />Metropolitan Counoil's review of the local water resources management plan is <br />concurrent with the watershed review. Comments are fOlwarded to the WMOs. The plan <br />does not have to be re-submitted to Metropolitan Council as a formal comprehensive plan <br />amendment for additional review. The adopted local plan will meet Metropolitan <br />Council's requirements and will be thereby recognized as a comprehensive plan <br />amendment. <br /> <br />EP A Storm Water Discl1arge Permit <br /> <br />Final rules were issued in October 1999 for EPA's Tier II National Pollution Discharge <br />Elimination System (NPDES) storm water discharge permits, resulting from the Clean <br />Water Act. MPCA is currently in the process of developing a state program. Tile final <br />rules for the Phase 1/ permits wiU likely not require monitoring. The rules apply to all <br />urban areas with population densities of more than 1000 persons per square mile. This is <br />in contrast to earlier indications that the program would only apply to communities of <br />50,000 and above. The reality is that the entire metropolitan area will fall under the Part II <br />rules, utilizing existing monitoring data from the Phase I program (Minneapolis and St. <br />Paul data). <br /> <br />Southeast Area Drainase Study Update <br />In the late 1990's a hydrologic model of the southeast area of the City was developed by <br />SEH. Changes which have occurred since the plan was completed should be documented. <br /> <br />Wetland Management <br />The need to be consistent with current wetland management laws is an important part of <br />the plan update. This will also define the role of wetlands in the storm water system and <br />the pretreatment requirements for storm water discharges. <br /> <br />Water Quality Focus <br />Minnesota Rules 8410 and Metropolitan Council requirements are much more focused on <br />water quality than were earlier requirements for water resources planning. The steps <br />included in a water quality planning effort include an inventory of existing water bodies, <br />classification of significant water resources, determination of baseline water quality <br />conditions, development of strategies to improve water quality and a proposed water <br />quality monitoring program. <br />