My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Untitled
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Sweetbay Ridge
>
Untitled
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 8:51:45 AM
Creation date
12/7/2006 1:29:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />necessary for them to go forward with the development of Sweet Bay Ridge, as well as their <br />proposed subdivision Brookfield, located at Nowthen Blvd. and 16ih. <br /> <br />On March 3, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the requ~st <br />for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Sweet Bay Ridge. Comments received at the public <br />hearing included concerns about traffic impacts, opening up Traprock as a through street, density <br />transition, the outstanding environmental studies, and site contamination from lead' shot. The <br />,Planning Commission discussed the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Sketch <br />Plan and raised similar concerns. On a 4-2 vote (1 abstention), the Planning. Commission <br />recommended denial of the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment: <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The City Council and Planning Commission have met in joint work session twice to discuss the <br />comprehensive plan amendment process. Ideally, the City, would have completed the <br />Comprehensive Plan rewrite prior to taking action on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />requests for Sweet Bay Ridge and Brookfield. Oakwood Land Development has exercised their <br />right to apply for an, amendment, therefore the City is required Jotakeaction on the request in a <br />timely manner, according to State Statute. <br /> <br />As stated above, the Planning Commission has recommended denial of the request for a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment, based on the comments .receivedat the public hearing. If <br />Council is inclined to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission, then City Staff <br />should be directed to draft a findings and resolution to support that decision. <br /> <br />City Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment for several reasons. First, all three of the development scenarios reviewed by the <br />City Council and the Planning Commission show the subject property being developed as Low- <br />Density Residential. Second, because of its size, Sweet Bay Ridge will require an Environmental <br />Assessment . Worksheet (EA W), which. will address transportation, environmental requirements, <br />and water control in greater detail than the comprehensive plan rewrite. Third, City Staff met <br />with Metropolitan Staff and they indicated that there is currently sewer capacity available to <br />service property south of Trott Brook. Met Council, Staff is also supportive of the City <br />processing comprehensive plan amendments to accommodate immediate requests for serVices <br />. and advised the City to submit the major Comprehensive Plan rewrite later this Fall when <br />regional systems plans are updated. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #05-03-_ approving the request and authorizing staff to submit the <br />_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />-or- <br /> <br />Motion to direct City Staff to draft the appropriate a resolution to support denial of the request <br />for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br />Community Development Director <br />. CC: 3/22/05 <br /> <br />Copies to: <br />City Attorney <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.