My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/20/2003 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/20/2003 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:57 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 10:22:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special
Document Date
05/20/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
44 <br /> <br />Site Plan Review: Alpine Acres <br />May 16, 2003 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> (10) overstory trees, twenty-four (24) ornamentals, and ninety-six (96) shrubs while the 4-unit <br /> buildings show eight (8) overstory trees, sixteen (16) ornamentals, and forty-eight (48) shrubs. <br /> The 4-unit buildings are meeting the minimum planting requirements but the 8-unit buildings are <br />· short six (6) overstory trees and eight (8) ornamentals per building. However, if the additional <br /> plantings along Nowthen Blvd are included, they would only be short six (6) overstory trees (this <br /> does not alleviate the ornamental requirements because no ornamentals are included in the <br /> additional plantings). <br /> <br />All species indicated on the species palette are acceptable according to' the Ramsey Tree Book. <br />One species, American Elm (resistant variety) is actually considered a preferred species. <br />However, there is some concern with the lack of diversity of species being planted. There needs <br />to be a larger pool of species planted along Nowthen Blvd and it is strongly recommended that a <br />larger pool of species be used around the buildings. This will enhance the site aesthetically as <br />well as act as a buffer against disease/insect infestations that can devastate monoculture <br />plantings. <br /> <br />The City needs to receive plans showing the typical plantings for both the 6-unit buildings as <br />well as the 3-unit buildings to determine if the plantings are adequate. Furthermore, .a revised <br />landscaping plan that shows a larger mix of species and also indicates how the ornamental <br />requirements will be met also should be submitted. Tree preserVation efforts may help offset, or <br />even fulfill, the planting requirements but a more detailed plan needs to be submitted. <br /> <br />Density Transitionin.~:. City Ordinances require a transition between higher density <br />developments and lower density developments. The subject development is required to provide <br />density transitioning along the western edge of the development as it is located adjacent to four <br />existing single-family homes. The site plan is proposing to satisfy density transitioning <br />requirements through the landscape buffer option. The buffer area must be a twenty-five (25) <br />foot wide area located along the common boundary. <br /> <br />This common boundary is roughly 1,000 feet in length, which would require a minimum of <br />twenty (20) deciduous overstory trees, twenty (20) evergreens, and twenty (20) understory trees <br />in the twenty-five foot wide buffer area. The site plan shows seventeen (17) deciduous, overstory <br />trees, eighteen (18) evergreens, and eighteen (18) understory trees. The current landscaping plan <br />either needs to be revised to meet the minimum requirements or a more detailed tree preservation <br />plan needs to be submitted to determine if existing trees, that are to remain after completion of <br />the development. <br /> <br />According to the current plan, all species used for the density transitioning requirements are <br />considered either acceptable or preferred as outlined in the Ramsey Tree Book. However, there <br />needs to be a larger mix of species to ensure diversity and longevity. Currently, only three <br />species are shown on the plan. A revised plan needs to be submitted that shows a more diverse <br />species palette. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.