My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/03/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/03/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:40 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 10:43:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/03/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have 25-foot long driveways, the units will need to be pushed closer to the exterior boundary <br />lines in order to meet the standard. <br />Narrower road right-of-way than required. Cun-ent regulations require that urban streets <br />have at least 60 feet of dedicated public right-of-way. The proposed development shows 50 <br />feet public right-of-ways. <br />Narrower constructed street widths. Current regulations require that urban public streets are <br />32 feet wide as measured from back of curb to back of curb. The submitted preliminary plat <br />shows public streets as being 26 feet wide as measured from back of curb to back of curb. As <br />the City Council knows, there has been a lot of discussion regarding the proposed street <br />widths. The Planning Commission, at their February 6, 2003 meeting, recommended that the <br />public streets be 28 feet wide, the one-way streets be 20 feet wide, and the private streets be <br />24 feet wide with no parking. The Planning Commission recognized, however, that the Staff <br />may be able to negotiate a mutually agreeable street width solution. At the February 18, 2003 <br />Public Works Meeting, it was agreed that the street widths shall be as follows: <br /> a) All public streets shall be 28 feet wide as measured from back of curb to back of <br /> curb and shall have parking restricted to one side of the street. <br /> b) The one-way streets around the center green shall be 20 feet wide from back of <br /> curb to back of curb with no on-street parking allowed. <br /> c) The one-way streets on the main north-south road spine entering from Sunwood <br /> Dr. shall be 16 feet wide from back of curb to back of curb with no on-street <br /> parking allowed. <br /> d) The one-way private streets in the cottage area shall be 18 feet from back of curb <br /> to back of curb ~vith parking only allowed in the designated pull-off parking <br /> nodes. <br /> e) The two-way private streets in the cottage area shall be 24 feet wide from back of <br /> curb to back of curb with no on-street parking allowed. <br />Private streets through the association-maintained cottages. The developer is showing a <br />private street with the two-way portion being 24 feet wide and the one-way portions being 16 <br />feet wide. As mentioned above the 16 feet wide one-way portions shall be changed to 18 feet <br />wide streets. The use exclusively of a private street through the cottage area, however, is a <br />deviation fi'om City Ordinances that require a public road "spine" through a development. <br /> <br />The PUD ordinance requires that the development have either 20% public open space and/or <br />50% private and open space. The Park Commission, at their January 8, 2003 meeting did not <br />recommend the provision of public open space within the development and would be inclined to <br />collect park dedication fees from the development. This was mostly due to the existence of a <br />planned park at the corner of the Sunwood Dr. and Sunfish Lake Blvd. about ¼ of a mile to the <br />west. Based on that input, Staff is requesting that the development have at least 50% private <br />open and green space. The development shows 64 % open and green space. City Ordinances <br />also require that at least 10% of the open space be in an identifiable area. The proposed plat <br />meets this requirement. Also, as part of the PUD process, the applicant is required to submit a <br />preliminary site plan and architectural elevations. Typically, multi-family developments require <br />site plan review. However, since the plat is comprised of single-family units and detached <br />townhomes a site plan is not required. Therefore, Staff will be using the PUD process to conduct <br />a site plan review. In general, the site plan is dependent on what is allowed as part of the PUD <br /> <br />City Council/February 25, 2003 <br /> Page 11 of 24 <br /> <br />P31 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.