My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:14 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
72 <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />ll.. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That the proposed rezoning is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (~MUSA) <br />boundary. <br /> <br />That the Subject Property is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and the <br />surroUnding adjacent properties are zoned R-I Single Family Residential. <br /> <br />That the development will include single-family homes and assoCiation-maintained cottages. <br /> <br />That the development is propos, ing to deviate from City Ordinances in the following manner; <br />smaller lot sizes and narrower lot widths for the urban-single family lots than required, <br />reduced building setbacks than required, narrower road right-of-way than required, <br />narrower constructed street widths, and the exclusive use of private streets through the <br />association-maintained cottages. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is proposing to have 64% private open space as part of the development, <br />which exceeds the 50% requirement for private open space required under City Ordinances. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is/is not proposing a high quality of design and design compatible with <br />surrounding land uses, both existing and planned. <br /> <br />That a wider range of housing types, price ranges and styles than could be accomplished <br />under existing zoning is/is not being proposed. <br /> <br />That the proposed public amenities, facilities and open spaces are/are not greater than the <br />minimum requirements of existing zoning and determined to be ih the public good. <br /> <br />13. That the Applicant is propOsing a development that is/is not compatible with the purposes <br /> and intents of this Zoning Chapter and the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed development will/will not exercise anY substantial detrimental-influence <br /> on the market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/will not show a favorable economic impact on the <br />community at large. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/will not adversely impact natural features such as <br />wetlands, water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/will not protect and preserve, scenic qualities to the <br />greatest extent possible. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/Will not impose any undUe burden on public services <br />and facilities, including fire and police protection, schools, streets, water systems, sanitary <br />sewer systems and storm sewer systems. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #03-02- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.