My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:29:20 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:23:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/07/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Goodrich stated that it could be that during the moratorium process the Council <br />might find that the official mapping process is not for them or they might find that it is <br />appropriate. What the City is looking at doing is holding off on any further development until <br />that decision is made. ·: · <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that it seems that the Council is not .-sure what kind of <br />moratorium they want. - <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the Council will establish parameters for the,,moratorium and <br />then during the moratorium they will decide what type of official ,mapping the w~ant. At this tim~ <br /> <br />they were not deciding what kind of official map they want or what the contents of that will be or <br />even if they want one. ' - <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the City could simply ignore what might happen in the future and let <br />the State deal with it, but more than likely the City wilt have .to be involved anyway. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that in the past when the CounCil has adopted moratorium <br />ordinances they have adopted them for tess than 12 months. ~ '!.--, <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that when that has been done in4~e .paSt it affected the <br />maximum number of months a mor, atorium is..allowed. He stated that if they adopt the initial <br />moratorium for less than 12 months itreduces the'max/mum amount of ~e. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that that was not true. ~'":' _ · :- <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the;City~ttorney waR' sure. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes. ~ <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that if the initial period is not to exceed one year and you can <br />extend it for up to 18 months that is for 30 years. If they start at 90 days and they can extend up <br />to 18 months he believed the City Attorney has taken the position that the maximum time would <br />be less than 30 months. <br /> <br />. --:: 'City Attorney Goodrich replied that that was not the case. <br /> <br /> Councihnember Hendriksen replied that he believed that the City Attorney had ruled differently <br /> <br />that the Council needed to discuss the parameters of the <br /> <br />in the past. f ~ <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated <br />moratorium. <br /> <br />P132 <br /> <br />Mayor GameC stated that he would have no problem with improvements being done on an <br />existing structure, but he would not a~ee to any new construction. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />City Council/October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 12 of 35 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.