My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:29:20 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:23:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/07/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik inquired if any project that has already received site <br />plan approval would be able to move forward with their project. -~:~'~ ~'- <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that that was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman agreed that improvements on existing stmctures?~i~0uld'~b~allowed, <br />but not new construction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he wants to see the moratorium., be in ~':'~ce for 12 mon~hs~ <br />and 'than they reduce it if appropriate. <br /> <br />Consensus was to place a 12-month moratorium on the propfi~ north of Highway gl0 and south <br />of the railroad tracks within the City limits. ' ?~/ <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the moratorium?)3;5'Sia:prohibit ~3(:subdivision, rezoning, <br />new building construction, and any building permits, unless ~i~d~r~s.sr~';:~S gfiS'exception. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he did not think that property owners should be required to do <br />improvements required by the City during the moratorium. <br /> - ~ ~,.'~' ~,,~- <br /> <br />Community Development Director. Fr;l~k?;.~quired if all the busine;0~e:~'that are currently <br />operating on dirt can continue to do sol during the:rhOratorium. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that that was corr~t; .~-:~.-~- ~':"~'!~?¢. · <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman agreed with ~hs;~;':Gamec. <br /> <br />Commumty Development':Frolik inquired if"~0 Sporting Goods wants to extend their display <br />area could they do so on dirt. '~:' <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied .no. he ,f~l{"t'hat those types of issues should come to the <br />Council under the exception provision;" . <br /> <br />:Community Development Director Frotik noted that currently staff reviews paving plans and <br />approves them. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that· he.thought that it should stay that way. <br /> <br />Councilmember .Zimmerman stated that property owners shouldn't be required to do <br />improvements being required by the City until the moratorium is lifted. <br /> <br />CouncilmmT~ber Anderson inquired as to how they keep Highway #10 from being "shabby" <br />without requiting the improvements. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer Olson inquired if ProSporting Goods will have to come before the <br />Council for a parking lot expansion plan. <br /> <br /> City Council/October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 13 of 35 <br /> <br />P133 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.