My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/27/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2026
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/27/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2026 1:18:57 PM
Creation date
8/21/2026 11:59:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Musgrove asked if a larger lot would be able to have multiple areas as long as they <br />were broken up by at least three feet, noting that she would not want to minimize options for <br />landscaping. <br />Senior Planner Anderson replied that the Planning Commission could make the recommendation <br />to add the word "contiguous". <br />Commissioner Allshouse stated that he believes 100 square feet is very limiting. He commented <br />that his wife has had a garden for ten years that exceeds the ten -by -ten limit. <br />Chairperson Gengler asked for clarification on whether this applies to a flower bed or garden or <br />just natural landscaping. <br />Senior Planner Anderson confirmed that typical flower gardens and vegetable gardens are not <br />included in this. He explained that this would apply to a managed natural landscape. He <br />commented that staff is not finding issues with rain gardens or pockets around trees, but with <br />people who attempt to do natural landscaping for their whole yard but do not actively manage it <br />and it becomes unsightly. <br />Chairperson Gengler asked for more information on whether there is a list of what is a weed and <br />what is not. <br />Senior Planner Anderson explained that is why the management plan is important, as a weed is <br />something that is not intended to be established where it is growing. He stated that if after three <br />years, more than 25 percent of the area contains things that were not intended to be there, it would <br />be deemed a failure. <br />Commissioner Musgrove recognized that this is a State mandate and asked if this would already <br />be addressed in the nuisance Code. She stated that people like to have their property looking nice, <br />and when things become overgrown, she did not believe it was for lack of want but for another <br />reason that may arise. She asked if other cities have similar types of regulation. <br />Senior Planner Anderson stated that the City had provisions allowing this type of landscaping <br />before the State mandated it, but there is more interest in it because it has become more known. <br />He commented that there have been problems related to the failed establishment, but without <br />specificity of what is included in the management plan, it has become difficult to enforce. He <br />stated that they are being mindful and not being onerous, while also ensuring that they can <br />successfully enforce the Code when needed. <br />Commissioner Musgrove stated that she would like to add the word continuous as previously <br />discussed. She commented that she would like to see feedback on what has worked or has not <br />worked as they implement this. <br />Senior Planner Anderson stated that the intention is to solidify the Code, so they can specify that <br />this is allowed and what would need to be provided to the City. He stated that the management <br />Planning Commission/ July 23, 2026 <br />Page 4of10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.