Laserfiche WebLink
however, the majority of the traffic will go somewhere else - and some of this traffic is <br />cut-through traffic. Some of this traffic problem will be rectified with the construction of <br />#116. That will provide a quicker route, however, even after #116 is constructed, there <br />will be a certain amount of internal neighborhood traffic. A good portion of the traffic <br />will disappear. The alternatives petitioned for by the 149th Avenue residents is a cul-de- <br />sac at 149th and Uranimite. They also suggested that the City could horseshoe 149th <br />Avenue and 149th Lane by providing a diagonal barrier across the intersection. That <br />would take substantial traffic off 149th Lane and Avenue but it would place that traffic <br />somewhere else. <br /> <br />Robert Hanson, 14960 Uranimite Street NW, stated he lives right on the comer of the <br />suggested barrier. He is concerned about the speeding traffic problem but also expressed <br />concern about the barrier causing a right turn only intersection which would also be a <br />problem. Roads do not necessarily belong to neighborhoods, everyone has the right to <br />use them. Closing off a road and redirecting traffic will not help anything. He felt that <br />the extension of#116 will help the problem. Shifting the traffic is not a solution to the <br />problem. He noted that the petition has 56 signatures on it but there are actually about <br />200 people in the area. He stated he is against the cul-de-sac and the diagonal diverters. <br />Some alternatives would be added patrolling, maybe speed bumps and/or stop signs plus <br />a neighborhood watch would help. He felt anything but redirecting traffic would make a <br />difference. He understood the issue of speed being the safety of children but questioned <br />what speed is safe enough to allow children to play on the roadside. He felt that 15 miles <br />per hour wasn't even slow enough for that. The most important thing to do is to not <br />allow children to pay in the streets. He submitted a petition which is attached to these <br />minutes marked "Exhibit A". The petition was received by Councilmember Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated she visited the area suggested for diagonal diverters <br />and feels it will not work as it is sending added traffic to the neighborhood with the deaf <br />child. She noted that what is being talked about is not being advocated. This is in <br />response to things brought up by the neighborhood. Councilmember Haas Steffen stated <br />that she came to Ramsey in 1971. The township was not building streets for children to <br />play on and the City is not building them for playing on now either. The streets in the <br />149th Avenue area are not safe for walking or biking. She suggested that trails should be <br />discussed with the Park and Recreation Commission. She suggested also looking at <br />moving the crosswalk up at the first entrance to Tom Thumb from the north on #56 - <br />maybe move that down to 149th and that would hook up with Tom Thumb. Trails could <br />be looked at for behind that area. She reiterated that children do not belong in the streets. <br /> <br />Patty Hoffman, 7446 - 149th Avenue NW, Ramsey, asked the signers of the petition <br />presented this evening where they have been with their suggestions for the last year and a <br />half. She stated her group has been coming before the Council with ideas and it would <br />have been helpful if the whole group would have been present with ideas instead of now <br />the neighborhoods appearing to be in an us against them situation. She did not really <br />know what the point of the petition was as the Council appears not to be in favor of a cul- <br />de-sac anyway. The diagonal diverters were brought up as a possible solution. She <br /> <br />Road and Bridge Committee/May 19, 1998 <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />