Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Haas Steffen pointed out that even if we buy the houses, we do not have <br />to get into the business of moving them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen talked about, for example, a government agency taking a <br />house and using it for a women's shelter, etc. She told of the need for this type of <br />housing - to make it so a single mother, for example, could stay in the area. She felt that <br />would be a better use for a home than using it for a practice burn. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Kapler stated that when the Fire Department talked about a <br />house burn for training, they were not talking about 14 homes - they were talking about <br />one home. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen suggested contacting Pat McFarland, Director of the <br />Community Action Program for Anoka County, to see what he can work out. He has <br />contacts who work on this type of thing. She added that she is not looking for the City to <br />make any money on this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski continued with the update. A Project Path Report has been prepared and <br />submitted and accepted by MnDOT. This report serves as a scoping document of the <br />impact the project will have on the area. and the environment. We have received <br />comments on the project from the Anoka County Highway Department and Paul and <br />Kimberly Foss of the Willow Ridge subdivision. He presented the documents and stated <br />they have been sent to SRF, Inc. Mr. Jankowski stated that the City has received a letter <br />from MnDOT, dated June 2, 1998, advising the City that it is now authorized to proceed <br />with the environmental assessment and that property can now be acquired under hardship <br />or protective buys. We are still looking at mid-August for the public hearing. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to the Laws property and figuring out some type of walkway <br />on T.H. #47 and C.R. #5 - to make it safe for seniors. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski noted the letter from Anoka County, commenting on the Project Path <br />Report, which states their concerns. TheY prefer that the intersection at 142nd Avenue <br />not be signalized. Signalized intersections to the south at C.S.A.H. #116 and to the north <br />at C.S.A.H. #5, together with the property access via Xkimo Street on the east, would <br />better preserve the through-travel function of T.H. #47. In his letter, Mr. Olson also <br />wrote that, based on the layout included in the document, there doesn't appear to be <br />enough space for a rural ditch section between improved T.H. #47 and the recreational <br />trail on the east side, particularly between stations 2+400 and 2+950. Mr. Olson also <br />asked to evaluate the proposed grades and western termini of the T.H. #47/C.S.A.H. #5 <br />intersection. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen felt that #47 will be much safer with lights at 142nd to <br />which Councilmember Zimmerman agreed. <br /> <br />Road and Bridge Committee/June 16, 1998 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />