My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/23/1998
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
1998
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/23/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 3:54:12 PM
Creation date
6/12/2003 9:40:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/23/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5) Municipal Buildings <br /> <br />Fire Building may do an interfund loan - maybe use money from the Landfill Trust Fund or <br />maybe we should be looking at using TIF monies. Staff was directed to find out from the law <br />firm of Kennedy and Graven if the City can use TIF for the construction of the second fire <br />station. Location of the fire station was discussed. Questions were asked such as what type of <br />shot can they use at the gun club, do they have to do anything to make it safer, the agreement <br />with the gun club should be reviewed, are the hours addressed, etc. <br /> <br />6) Park Improvements <br /> <br />Lake Itasca District - Lake Itasca Park Phase I ~ Councilmember Haas Steffen felt that grading <br />and seeding should be in maintenance, not on the CIP. She felt this type of"stuff" is "piddly" - <br />not major enough for the CIP. She suggested things like buildings, etc., are large items. She also <br />suggested there should be committees to deal with their own requests - they would be discussed <br />and the big ticket items would be placed on the CIP. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer stated that the piecemeal way this CIP is presented makes it hard to <br />understand. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated that Council should be telling the Parks Department what <br />amount they would be getting - but do not list things like playground equipment in the CIP. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec didn't necessarily agree with that. If that is the way it would be, what kind of a <br />planning document would we have. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen felt that the CIP should be the big picture for parks, roads, etc. The <br />Park and Recreation Commission, Road and Bridge Committee, etc. would discuss issues related <br />to them and then it would be presented in the CIP to Council. Council would also get the reports <br />from the committees. Each department would present a budget - then we would have to figure <br />out if we can give them the money in that budget. She suggested that Council should define a <br />dollar amount that would qualify for the CIP plan. The breakdown would be done by <br />departments and it would put more responsibility on the commissions. <br /> <br />City Administrator, for clarification, stated that all the information would be made available to <br />the Council, however, the CIP would be more abbreviated. Staff will "take a shot" at another <br />format. <br /> <br />A community center was briefly discussed. Council suggested staff put together some type of <br />plan for city hall and a community center within three years. <br /> <br />3) General Fund Excess Revenues 1997 <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman noted a memorandum fi'om Finance Officer Jessie Hart referring to <br />the Excess Revenue Policy. The excess revenue funds to transfer amount to $813,270.26. <br />Normally 10% goes into the Equipment Revolving Fund, 40% into the Facilities Construction <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/March 23, 1998 <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.