My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:38:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 8:32:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/14/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Wald noted that City Code requires 40 percent open space and the developer is <br />proposing 64 percent of open space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak replied that City Code currently allows for Ponds and wetlands to be <br />considered open space, which she does not agree with. In her opinion she thought the proposed <br />development was too compact. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that this development would provide for more open space than other <br />developments approved in the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated his position is that the City has enacted a comprehensiVe plan <br />that allows for too much density.. : <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated-that the Council should address the issUe of how they determine <br />open space in the City Code as soon as possible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the Council does not have to approve the configuration <br />and if they feel there should be more open space then they should vOte: against it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the developer was willing to provide for more open sPace by <br />eliminating one of the end units. <br /> <br />Dave Schulte, Turtle Moon, Inc., stated that they have worked hard to comply with all' of the <br />.City's requirements. He also noted that as part of Rivenwick. 1st and 2nd' they donated- a <br />significant amount of parkland, Which he reviewed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if there will be a trail from the proposed development to the <br />existing parkland. <br /> <br />Mr. Schulte replied that that is what. the Park Commission has requested. <br /> <br />'Councilmember Kurak inquired as to how the developer was proposing to address existing <br />intrusion issues from adjoining neighbors along the existing berm. <br /> <br />Mr. Schulte replied that there is an issue of a fence on one of the properties and they are Willing <br />to work with those people by granting them an easement as to not cloud the title. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she would like that language to be included in the development <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen requested that the developer identify what the interim solutiOn will <br />be for the second access to Highway #10. <br /> <br />Mr. Schulte reviewed'their solution. <br /> <br />City Council/November 12, 2002' <br /> Page 14 of 22 <br /> <br />-129- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.