My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/07/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/07/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:46 AM
Creation date
6/4/2007 7:51:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/07/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Preliminary Plat Revie"i~T: CBR Development <br />June 1,2007 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />Lots 1 and 5 propose a reduced front yard setback to 25 feet. Please revise the plat to reflect the <br />required setbacks. All other setback regulations conform. <br /> <br />Architectural Standards~ There are no specific architectural requirements for single-family <br />developments. However, elevations have been submitted, and propose to provide single-level <br />homes with two-car garages and front porches. <br /> <br />Landscaping: The following comments are offered regarding the landscaping plan, dated April <br />24, 2007: <br /> <br />. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) ,of the plantings must be conifers (none are <br />shown on the plan). <br />It Trees should be planted at a depth such that the root flare is at finished grade. <br />s Trees should be installed in the front yards of the lots; trees on lots 2 and 3 should be <br />relocated. <br />41> . Some consideration should be given to additional plantings along County Road 5 to <br />provide some buffering against noise, dust, and headlight glare generated by traffic. <br /> <br />A revised landscaping plan must be submitted. <br /> <br />Tree Preservation: A tree preservation plan was not submitted and the inventory needs to <br />provide additional information inclucfulg species, size, condition and \vhether trees are to be <br />preserved or removed. Also, tree save fencing must be shown on the plan for all trees being <br />preserved. In the field, tree save fencing must be installed at the dripline of individual trees or <br />groups of trees and must be in place prior to any construction activity. <br /> <br />Grading and Drainage: A preliminary grading plan has been prepared by Martin Campion of <br />Otto Engineering. Staff has reviewed this plan and offers the following comments: <br />It Topographic contours should be extended 100 feet beyond the boundaries of the plat. <br />o The type, size, invert, and rim elevations of all storm sewers should be added to the <br />grading plan. <br />o A table specifying house type, garage elevation, lowest opening elevation, street <br />centerline grade, and 1 00 year flood elevation for riparian lots. <br />. Front and back yard slopes must be added to the plan. <br />o The grading plan should contain normal and 100 year elevation for the ponding area and <br />also emergency overflow elevations showing tlle overland runoff elevation. <br />It Silt fence should be extended around the entireproject grading site. <br />s A trail needs to be incorporated iIito the grading plan design. This trail is normally <br />required to be within the boundaries of the platted development. <br />It There is not enough detail presented to determine "\vhere lots 4 and 5 drain. They appear <br />to drain onto the lots to the east and south. Consideration should be providing yard drains <br />to the ponding area to prevent drainage onto adjacent properties. <br /> <br />106 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.