My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/22/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1997
>
Minutes - Council - 04/22/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:06:30 PM
Creation date
6/24/2003 9:06:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/22/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Haas Steffen, Beahen, Beyer, and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: Drainage Concern: 6508 - 171st Lane NW <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that Loft Farber of 6508 - 171st Lane NW appeared at the <br />Council meeting of April 8, 1997, to discuss an ongoing problem she has been experiencing with <br />lot drainage and her septic system. He explained that her existing septic system was constructed <br />in 1985 when the house was built. The soils were clay and a decision was made to double the <br />size of the required system. The system is in close proximity of the right of way of 171st, is in a <br />low area, and drains by gravity from the house to the system. The problem occurs in heavy rains <br />and snow. Because of the underlying clay soils, it does not perk down - it comes back into the <br />house. Ms. Farber claims that the City is responsible because the septic was installed under the <br />inspection of the City, the City has not provided adequate drainage of storm water which would <br />prevent ponding over her system and the City granted a variance to the property to the west (the <br />Smith property) for the construction of a single-family home whose drainage caused the problem. <br />Mr. Jankowski's response to Ms. Farber's claim that the City is liable because they inspected it is <br />that the purpose of the City septic system code is to protect public health and safety by ensuring <br />minimum standards are met. The code specifies a minimum size of the system's absorption <br />field. These standards were met and, in this case, exceeded. Other than separation distances <br />from wells, the code does not specify citing criteria. This is the obligation of the designer and, <br />ultimately, the property owner. The system was placed in a low elevation to minimize cost. <br />Ponding water backflowing through the system is a consequence of citing the system in a low <br />area. Mr. Jankowski's response to Ms. Farber's claim that the City is not providing adequate <br />storm drainage is as follows: the purpose of the City's roadside ditch is to provide drainage for <br />the City street. In this area the road is well drained. Temporary ponding of water in a road ditch <br />is an acceptable condition as it relates to the City street. The City does have a responsibility for <br />handling drainage from its street system, particularly where mn-off fi.om large areas are directed <br />along a pathway defined by ditches and pipe, or are discharged fi.om such pathways into ponding <br />areas. In this case, there is less than 100 feet of roadway upgrade from the problem point. This <br />hardly constitutes a situation where the City has caused an unusually large concentration of water <br />to accumulate as a result of its street and drainage system. With regard to Ms. Farber's claim <br />that the City granting a variance and allowing the neighboring property to construct a single- <br />family home which caused the mn-off problem, Mr. Jankowski's response is that the existing <br />property west of the Farber property was vacant until the fall of 1992. A variance from the <br />section of City Code which requires 200 feet of frontage was granted by the City Council The <br />property has only 66 feet of frontage, which consists of the western terminus of 171st Lane. The <br />alternative of not granting the variance would have caused the dedication and construction of a <br />portion of 171 st Lane, either with a cul-de-sac or an extension of the street. In either case, it <br />would not have changed the mn-off patterns and would, in fact, have increased the amount of <br />mn-off from paved surfaces. This neighboring property was developed in a reasonable manner <br />and is consistent with the types of structures and landscaping found elsewhere in the <br />neighborhood. Drainage form the property is not excessive or maliciously directed. In his <br />opinion, while the development of the neighboring property may have exacerbated the problem, <br />it did not cause it. The natural topography causes drainage toward Farber's low area. Mr. <br />Jankowski stated that he had personally received a complaint form the property north of the <br /> <br />City Council/April 22, 1997 <br /> Page 6 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.