Laserfiche WebLink
Farber's property about water ponding in the front yard, which is very fiat and is located at the <br />toe of the hill, similar to Farber's property. This complaint occurred before the property to the <br />west was developed. In addition, Public Works Supervisor Mevissen had received calls from the <br />previous occupants of Farber's residence regarding the same situation Ms. Farber has described. <br />Mr. Jankowski believed that the solution to Ms. Farber's problem involves relocating the soil <br />absorption field to a location which is not subject to flooding. The City has a policy which deals <br />with the repair of failing septic systems. Although the policy is largely directed toward <br />eliminating public health hazards when the responsible property owner is unwilling or unable to <br />facilitate repairs, the policy does provide a mechanism for the City to finance the repair of a <br />failed system if the property owner cannot arrange alternative financing. <br /> <br />Loft Farber, 6508 - 171st Lane NW, Ramsey, stated that the problem did not occur prior to the <br />Smith's building their home and that the previous owner did not have a drainage problem. She <br />presented pictures to the Council showing what the water in her downstairs. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec suggested ditching on Ms. Farber's side of the road. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman agreed with Mr. Jankowski in that the best solution is to relocate <br />the septic area and added that the City may be somewhat responsible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen agreed that adding more homes, blacktop roads, etc. contribute to a <br />water problem and that the City Engineer and the City Attorney should meet with the Farbers. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that this property has always been low and he questioned whether the City <br />would have any liability other than cleaning out that drainage ditch. However, he felt the <br />Farber's would still have a water problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski reiterated that the only way to solve this drainage problem is to relocate the septic <br />field. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman asked what would be the City's responsibility in this instance if it <br />was found that the drainage was caused by something that is the City's fault. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the City Engineer has advised him that the parcel to the west <br />is large and the development had little if any impact on this property. With regard to that, we all <br />participate in some drainage issues. Everyone's property is expected to take a reasonable amount <br />of drainage. In this case, the Farber's are saying that they are taking an unreasonable amount. <br />The City is responsible to take care of storm water from that street that it contributed, however, <br />this is not enhancing it. Based on the City Engineer's observation, there would be no liability on <br />the part of the City. If the neighbor to the west is creating drainage problems, that would be an <br />issue between them and the Farber's. <br /> <br />Gerry Lambrecht, 6537 - 171st Lane NW, Ramsey, stated that when the Smith's put in their <br />driveway, they changed the slope of the hill, thus causing the drainage problem. He added that <br />four years ago, when the City built the ditch, that took care of 95% of his problem. <br /> <br />City Council/April 22, 1997 <br /> Page 7 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />