Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Mayor Gamec and seconded by Councilmember Haas Steffen to direct the City <br />Attorney and the City Engineer to meet with the property owners and bring a proposal to resolve <br />this situation back to the City Council meeting of May 27. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Haas Steffen, Beahen, Beyer and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #3: Utility Connection Requirements for 6710 Highway 10 <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart explained that the property located at 6710 Highway #10 is located in what <br />has been known as the "special utility district". This area was established as the result of the <br />extension of municipal sewer and water in 1987. The assessable costs, which were not assessed <br />directly to the benefiting properties, were allowed to be placed on the utility billing as service <br />availability surcharge (SAS) at the time of connection. These charges appear quarterly on the <br />utility bill, with accrued interest, for a period of 10 years. Properties within the special district <br />were required to connect to the City's utility system upon failure of existing systems, ' upon the <br />transfer of the property (sale) or within two years, under the City's connection policy. Ms. Hart <br />continued that it was brought to staff's attention last fall that this property changed owners in <br />May, 1996. This information was obtained directly from the new owner when an attempt to <br />collect delinquent alarm charges was made. The new owner was notified in November, 1996, <br />that it would be necessary for this property to connect to City services. Under the connection <br />policy, this property should have been connected during 1989, and the owner was requested to <br />meet with the City officials to determine how the alarm and trunk charges would be satisfied. <br />Ms. Hart sent another letter to the property owner earlier this month again asking for a meeting to <br />discuss the issue of connecting to City utility services. No response has been received. Ms. Hart <br />reported that this policy has been enforced on at least two occasions within the last three years. <br />When Blue Line Collision and what is now known as McKay's Rapid Auto changed hands, each <br />property connected to City utility services and opted to have the charges placed on their utility <br />billing. There are 14 properties that have elected to utilize the SAS charge to pay the utility <br />trunk charges. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Haas Steffen and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to direct City <br />Attorney Goodrich to initiate legal action to enforce the utility connection policy as it pertains to <br />the property located at 6710 Highway # 10. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Haas Steffen, Beahen, Beyer and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #4: Implementation of Chapter 8 of the Charter <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder reminded Council that discussions of implementing Chapter 8 of <br />the Charter included discussion about a "due on sale" clause. He presented two ordinances, one <br />that was presented at the last meeting and the other is the same but has a provision that addresses <br />this "due on sale" discussion. Staff is requesting additional direction or the introduction of one <br />of the ordinances. <br /> <br />City Council/April 22, 1997 <br /> Page 8 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />