My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 06/04/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2007
>
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 06/04/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:28:29 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 10:28:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
06/04/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Board Member Bentz suggested if another city wanted to do the same thing, they should <br />be advised that it might be quicker to skip some of the data collection, and just do the <br />ground-truthing rather than go through map layers. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson concurred, that in hindsight, it's possible that a lot <br />of data review done in the office could have been eliminated if it was known that every <br />wetland was going to be field verified anyway. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda stated it is now known that about ten percent of data analysis was <br />changed on field verification. He stated that the Board would probably recommend to <br />other cities to go with field verification if there was a lot of diversity in wetlands from <br />Preserve to Manage 3. <br /> <br />Board Member Max concurred now that field verification has been done, there could be a <br />better predicted model. <br /> <br />Board Member Bentz stated there might be some future cost savings if the map overlays <br />were stripped out of the process. <br /> <br />Board Member Max concurred with Board Member Bentz that soil layers and making <br />predictions about what was there could have been alleviated. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda suggested taking some time to do post analysis of the process. The <br />EPB has gone through numerous processes with wetland buffers and tree ordinance <br />changes. He suggested doing this, both for Ramsey and for sister cities, because there <br />might be a future preservation program similar to this again some day. <br /> <br />Board Member Freeburg asked how Westwood Professional Services data and Bolton & <br />Menk, Inc. data would be merged. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that the two sets of data should be fairly <br />simple to merge into a GIS database. Potentially a column identifier could be added <br />indicating which firm conducted the field analysis. <br /> <br />Board Member Max stated they all use the same database provided by BWSR. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda wondered if Bolton & Menk, Inc. would verify any of the data <br />already provided by Westwood Professional Services. <br /> <br />Board Member Max stated that if one firm upgrades or downgrades a wetland, it would <br />be interesting to see if they are using the same criteria. <br /> <br />Board Member Sibilski stated that he would prefer to hold off on verifying data. <br /> <br />Board Member Bentz stated that time has passed. To do an apples to apples comparison <br />it would probably have to be done under the same conditions. <br /> <br />Environmental Policy Board/June 4, 2007 <br />Page 3 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.