My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:31:18 PM
Creation date
8/10/2007 9:47:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/14/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
476
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notification: <br />In accordance with state statute, notification of the preliminary plat public <br />advertised. hearing was properly <br />Observations: <br />As directed by City Council, Staff convened a meeting on July 10, 2007, with Tim Boe of <br />Tri -Cor Development (the applicant), Durwood Sagwold (the owner of the middle, one -acre <br />property), Tony Welman and another board member from the Victorious Jesus Church (owner of <br />the northern parcel), John Peterson (Oakwood Development), and Ben Van See from <br />Commonwealth Solutions, a development company. The topics discussed included: the mar ket <br />value of the property, the feasibility of developing the parcels versus selling the parcels to the <br />applicant, and the development potential of the property, given its size and zoning. The church <br />representatives expressed interest in selling their parcel, indicating that they would not be able to <br />develop it or act as a partner due to staff and time constraints. The owner of the middle parcel <br />indicated that it was not possible to develop his parcel given the existing zoning and the <br />requirement for a through street. The applicant expressed interest in purchasing all the properties. <br />The developers that were present discussed the current market value of raw land, offering that <br />$90,000 to $100,000 per acre (or $25,000 to $30,000 per potential unit) was a generous, realistic <br />market value. Subsequently, the applicant conducted two separate appraisals of both properties to <br />the north and prepared purchase agreements equivalent to the appraised value for the parcels. The <br />offers were declined. <br />The applicant is proposing 7 detached townhomes. The property is zoned R -2 medium density <br />residential, which allows up to 7 units per acre. The overall density of the project is 4.1 units per <br />acre. Because detached townhomes were not defined in City Code when the preliminary plat was <br />considered, a PUD rezoning was processed and approved for this site. The units are a mix of <br />single -level and two -level homes. Detailed building elevations have been submitted and are <br />included in your packet. <br />The preliminary plat for GAD's Prairie was contingent upon the following items: <br />1) A rezoning to PUD (which was introduced, and eventually rezoned) <br />2) The installation of the temporary cul -de -sac and conveyance of an access easement to the <br />City across Lots 1 and 2 (the plan has been revised to eliminate the need for this access <br />easement) <br />3) Lots 1 and 2 to be classified as outlots (the plan has been revised to eliminate two lots in <br />order to accommodate the future cul -de -sac) <br />4) Compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated May 24, 2006 revised June 23, 2006 <br />One of the comments in the Staff Review Letter, revised June 23, 2006 noted that any City <br />approvals are contingent upon addressing the access and traffic concerns of the County. (Please <br />see the Access and Streets portion of the staff review letter.) However, the County failed to <br />submit comments regarding this plat until May 7, 2007. In this letter, the County outlines its <br />-146- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.