Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Gamec commented there are people with 5 to 6 acre parcels who do not cut the whole <br />thing, and often some of it backs up to farm fields. He requested clarification that this falls under <br />the other ordinance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon replied staff thinks this should be addressed under <br />Chapter 9. Once this ordinance is adopted they can come back and revisit this issue in Chapter <br />9. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he understands where staff is going with this and agrees they need <br />to get something on the books. He does not know of any City ordinance that does not need a bit <br />of tweaking. He suggested striking the language "stockpiles of rocks and dirt" in section f. He <br />stated in his area this will happen; he purposely does this to fill things when he moves trees <br />around, and larger properties will have to do that. He suggested striking the term "all grass" in <br />sectionj, as the problem seems to be the issue of noxious weeds. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated there are properties in his ward where landscaping materials have <br />been sitting there for five to seven years. It is important to note this abatement ordinance is <br />probably for 5% of the City's properties. He would like it to be more restrictive and have <br />common sense used in the enforcement. If it is a situation where someone has a dirt pile and is <br />trying to seed their yard, and it sits there for a year, there is common sense application. But <br />where it has sat there for five to eight years and nothing gets done, that is where they need some <br />teeth in it. There has to be a common sense approach to this, but they need teeth to take care of <br />the truly problematic conditions. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted if it is there for a year and the neighbors complain the City has to act <br />according to the ordinance. They could get into some rural areas where there are quite a few <br />mounds of dirt, mostly further to the north, but it is different in the residential areas. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated there are two properties he is aware of in Ward 4 that neglected <br />their properties. What happens is when you do not mow it allows the weeds to foster and grow <br />up. A sod farmer explained to him that the way to get rid of dandelions is to mow them. He <br />thinks if the weeds are growing up it is an indication that they are not mowing the grass. The <br />main problem is in more of the heavily residential areas, but you would not mow every square <br />inch of your property as they move north. He asked if the grass portion is broken out in Chapter <br />9. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon responded in the negative. He advised City Code <br />states in all platted areas the grass must be cut less than 12 inches; that is a good test to make the <br />differentiation. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator Nelson stated it is important to remember much of this has been in <br />place for 20 years, so while they are trying to tweak this and get it in place to work with the <br />abatement process, they should remember the spirit of the law and the discretion of the officer. <br />She does not think it will be on the top of staffs priorities to require someone to mow the ditch <br /> <br />City Council / September 11, 2007 <br />Page 11 of 22 <br />