Laserfiche WebLink
subdivision,I a p!oposed 202-townhouse unit subdivision located immediately north of the subject <br />property. The townhomes will be subject to site plan review for all other aspects of the proposal <br />including b~t n~¢t limited to architectural standards, off-street parking, structure setbacks, and <br />landscaping! T~e results of the site plan review may impact the actual number of townhomes to <br />be develop~l o~ the property. The property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The <br />applicant ha~ su,bmitted a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning application requesting <br />the City ch~ge !he outlot's designation in the Comprehensive Plan to medium density residential <br />and rezone'[thq property to R-2 Medium Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment! an~t Rezoning would allow the applicant to develop the subject property with <br />townhomeS. ! Th[ preliminary plat is showing a net density (exclusive of wetlands and major road <br />right-of-way~ ot~4.4 units per acre, the proposed development complies with the R-2 maximum <br />density restr~cticJn of 7 units per acre. The townhomes will be serviced by a private street that <br />provides acCess[to a public street located in the proposed Alpine Acres subdivision located <br />immediatelyinor~h of the subject property. A drainage and grading plan has been submitted and <br />detailed con~eOts are provided in the staff review letter attached to this case. The project is also <br />subject to th~ r&iew and permitting process of the Lower Rum River Watershed Management <br />Organization~ (W~ViO). The development will be serviced by municipal water and sanitary sewer. <br />The develoPment is subject to density transitioning since it is located adjacent to existing single- <br />family home~ along the western and northwestern plat boundary line. The applicant is proposing <br />to satisfy der:slty~transltlomng through the landscape buffer option. City Code requires a 25-foot <br />wide buffer ar~a along the common boundary line. Park dedication requirements are <br />recommende tot be satisfied through a cash payment. The preliminary plat meets open space <br />requirements~ <br /> <br />Motion by Couricilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Pearson, to adopt Resolution <br />#03-06-160 ~ipproving the preliminary plat contingent upon compliance with City staff review <br />letter dated M~ay ~0, 2003, revised June 20, 2003. <br /> <br />Motion carded, iVoting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Cook, Pearson, Kurak, and <br />Strommen. '~!otifigNo: CouncilmemberZimmerman. <br /> <br />Case #11: R~quest for Site Plan Review of Alpine Acres 2"a Addition; Case of Oak <br /> Cffeek Builders, Inc. <br /> <br />Associate Plahne~ Wald stated that the site plan is proposing a net density (exclusive of wetlands <br />and major ro4d ~ght-of-way) of 2.9 units per acre, the proposed development complies with the <br />R-2 maximu~ d~nsity restriction of 7 units per acre. The development will be serviced by a <br />private street ~hat[accesses a public street in the proposed Alpine Acres subdivision located north <br />of the subjeettproperty. The site plan complies with private street length and width requirements <br />established i~ City Code. The townhouse units meet or exceed townhouse size, setbacks, and <br />structure heig~ t r&quirements established in the R-2 District. The townhouse exterior materials <br />will consist ~f v!nyl siding and brick accents. The landscaping plan is generally acceptable <br />provided that lhe plan is revised to include some additional plantings in order to comply with the <br />number of re~luired plantings established in City Code. Staff is also recommending that the <br />species palett~ b6 revised to include a larger variety of plantings. The Planning Commission <br /> <br />City Council/June 24, 2003 <br />Page 26 of 37 <br /> <br /> <br />