My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:54:34 PM
Creation date
11/9/2007 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/13/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # <br />INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM <br />B-2 BUSINESS TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; <br />CASE OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY <br />By: Amy Geisler, AICP, Associate Planner <br />Background: <br />On October 9, 200.7 the City Council denied a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning <br />Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and Rezoning related to the plat of Ebony. Woods. The Council <br />also directed Staff to initiate a Zoning Amendment to change the property's zoning designation <br />from B-2 Business to R-1 Residential. <br />The following items are enclosed for your information:. <br />~a) Site Location Map <br />b) Land use/zoning exhibit <br />c) Proposed Findings of Fact <br />d) Proposed Ordinance <br />*City Council meeting minutes are included with the Comp Plan Amend~zent case <br />Notification; <br />Property owners within 700 feet were notified of the public hearing. Staff also sent a copy of the <br />staff report to Tim Holm and Dan Murphy, property owner and developer of Ebony Woods. <br />Funding Source: <br />The Zoning Amendment was initiated by the City, therefore tasks associated -with case <br />preparation are being conducted as a part of regular staff duties. <br />Observations: <br />The City Council had a lengthy discussion about the appropriateness ofdeveloping the. Subject <br />Property with twinhomes, Ultimately, it was determined that it was not. an appropriate use given <br />the adjacent single-family homes, but that the property's current zoning designation of B 2 <br />Business. was not appropriate either. Staff was directed to conduct a public hearing on whether it <br />should be changed to R-1 Residential. <br />The property is bordered on the north by the Superbowl building, on the west by mini-storage <br />units and single-family homes, on the south by asingle-family home under construction, and on <br />.the. east by single-family homes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.